A Quote by Louis Freeh

My role and my obligation was to conduct criminal investigations. — © Louis Freeh
My role and my obligation was to conduct criminal investigations.
The reason the FISA standard is constitutional is that the government is supposed to use FISA surveillance not for criminal investigations but for counterintelligence probes pursued under the president's authority to conduct foreign policy.
We should not burden a sitting president with civil suits, criminal investigations, or criminal prosecutions.
In existing criminology there are concepts: a criminal man, a criminal profession, a criminal society, a criminal sect, and a criminal tribe, but there is no concept of a criminal state, or a criminal government, or criminal legislation. Consequently what is often regarded as "political" activity is in fact a criminal activity.
Given our law enforcement authorities, our central role in the Intelligence Community, and the span of our responsibilities - from counterterrorism to counterintelligence to criminal investigations - we're particularly well-positioned to address cyber threats to our national security.
It's not the function of Congress to do criminal investigations.
Criminal law has to do with relations between the misbehaving individual and his government...Criminal law establishes rules of conduct; their breach, if prosecuted and conviction follows, results in punishment.
Derogatory information sometimes is disclosed in the course of criminal investigations and prosecutions, but we never release it gratuitously.
Like civil suits, criminal investigations take the president's focus away from his or her responsibilities to the people.
Bill Clinton was impeached primarily for criminal conduct: lying under oath and misleading a federal grand jury about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. Nixon would have been impeached for a wide array of criminal acts, as well as abuses of power.
Fraud investigations punish those who lie, knowing that they are lying, intending to fool others, and do it for money. No one should be too big to answer for that conduct.
The criminal conduct of Hillary Clinton threatens the foundations of democracy.
If conduct is intentional, it could subject some of the criminal liability.
But I can't take responsibility for criminal conduct of somebody inside the company.
As a former F.B.I. special agent who conducted counterintelligence investigations, I can attest that foreign intelligence services do not operate on the basis of explicit agreements or even actions that, standing alone, constitute criminal activity.
The Obama administration has had seven criminal leak investigations. That is more than twice the number of any previous administration in our history. It's on a scale never seen before.
Healthy competition is good for the global economy. Criminal conduct is not. Rampant theft is not. Cheating is not.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!