A Quote by Matt Smith

Any actor worth his salt has a responsibility to reinvent himself from part to part. — © Matt Smith
Any actor worth his salt has a responsibility to reinvent himself from part to part.
Any writer worth his salt writes to please himself.
Any writer worth his salt writes to please himself...It's a self-exploratory operation that is endless. An exorcism of not necessarily his demon, but of his divine discontent.
I have yet to find a man worth his salt in any direction who did not think of himself first and foremost.
We are not what we seem. We are more than what we seem. The actor knows that. And because the actor knows that hidden inside himself there's a wizard and a king, he also knows that when he's playing himself in his daily life, he's playing a part, he's performing, just as he's performing when he plays a part on stage.
Any historian worth their salt should be aware of wars, conflicts, catastrophes. They happen. This is part of the panorama.
An actor can change himself to fit a part, whereas a personality has to change the part to fit himself. The personality has to say it his own way.
The only part of the conduct of any one, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.
Any soldier worth his salt should be antiwar. And still there are things worth fighting for.
I think any actor worth their salt wants to show as much versatility as they possibly can.
It is the part of an uneducated person to blame others where he himself fares ill; to blame himself is the part of one whose education has begun; to blame neither another nor his own self is the part of one whose education is already complete.
I think every actor worth his or her salt wants to do good, meaningful cinema.
In philosophical anthropology, ... where the subject is man in his wholeness, the investigator cannot content himself, as in anthropology as an individual science, with considering man as another part of nature and with ignoring the fact that he, the investigator, is himself a man and experiences this humanity in his inner experience in a way that he simply cannot experience any part of nature.
The critical opinions of a writer should always be taken with a large grain of salt. For the most part, they are manifestations of his debate with himself as to what he should do next and what he should avoid.
Can policy be both wise and aggressively partisan? Ask any Republican worth his salt and the answer will be an unequivocal yes. Ask a Democrat of the respectable Beltway variety and he will twist himself into a pretzel denying it.
Dr. Aziz is a very deep and meaty part, a gift part for any actor.
[Man] is the only animal who lives outside of himself, whose drive is in external things—property, houses, money, concepts of power. He lives in his cities and his factories, in his business and job and art. But having projected himself into these external complexities, he is them. His house, his automobile are a part of him and a large part of him. This is beautifully demonstrated by a thing doctors know—that when a man loses his possessions a very common result is sexual impotence.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!