A Quote by Michael Lazerow

We're not in a world of information overload, we're in a world of filter failure. — © Michael Lazerow
We're not in a world of information overload, we're in a world of filter failure.
It’s not information overload. It’s filter failure.
There's no such thing as information overload-only filter failure.
I don't think we should have less information in the world. The information age has yielded great advances in medicine, agriculture, transportation and many other fields. But the problem is twofold. One, we are assaulted with more information than any one of us can handle. Two, beyond the overload, too much information often leads to bad decisions.
We do not experience things as they really are! We experience things only through a filter and that filter determines what information will enter our awareness and what will be rejected. If we change the filter (our belief system), then we automatically experience the world in a completely different way.
Everyone spoke of an information overload, but what there was in fact was a non-information overload.
In this world of numbness and information overload, the ability to feel, my boy, is a rare gift indeed.
We really are living in an age of information overload. Google estimates that there are 300 exabytes (300 followed by 18 zeros) of human-made information in the world today. Only four years ago there were just 30 exabytes. We've created more information in the past few years than in all of human history before us.
I think it was Samuel Johnson who said, "There are two kinds of information in this world: that what you know and that what you know where to get." The tools help the latter, and that's what keeps us from going nuts. The sense of overload comes from the gap between that sudden jump in volume (of information) and the tools we have to make sense of it.
The maps are really like a filter. They filter information for you to make better decisions on where you are going and what to do.
The 'gatekeepers' became a term of revile. But when you think about the flow of information, I personally value immensely the calibration a news organ, whether it's on the web or in print, brings to the floodwaters of information. I haven't the time to read all the dispatches of the Associated Press, for example. It's fantastic what they put out, it's extremely good, from all over the world. I like when someone acts as a filter.
We have an opportunity for everyone in the world to have access to all the world's information. This has never before been possible. Why is ubiquitous information so profound? It's a tremendous equalizer. Information is power.
The fewer data needed, the better the information. And an overload of information, that is, anything much beyond what is truly needed, leads to information blackout. It does not enrich, but impoverishes.
I don't think information overload is a function of the volume of information. It's a derivative of the volume of information plus the sense-making tools you have.
There's a lot more information at hand and sometimes there's information overload and we become desensitized to it, so things start to mean less.
One of the effects of living with electric information is that we live habitually in a state of information overload. There's always more than you can cope with.
"Point of view" is that quintessentially human solution to information overload, an intuitive process of reducing things to an essential relevant and manageable minimum... In a world of hyperabundant content, point of view will become the scarcest of resources...
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!