A Quote by Michel Houellebecq

When a country is strong... it accepts any dose of pessimism from its writers. — © Michel Houellebecq
When a country is strong... it accepts any dose of pessimism from its writers.
Any country that accepts abortion is the poorest of the poor
By any reasonable standard of proof, the combination of human epidemiology and track-analysis demonstrates that there is no threshold dose or dose-rate below which "repair" invariably prevents health harm.
Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love but to use violence to get what they want.
There is no safe dose of radiation since radiation is cumulative. Harm in the form of excess human cancer occurs at all doses of ionizing radiation, down to the lowest conceivable dose and dose rate.
Men like the kings and the queens because men are weak! No strong man accepts any king or queen!
The screening in the United States is the toughest screening of any country in the world in terms of refugees, that accepts refugees. And of course there are those that don`t accept any, or ever have, no matter what kind they are.
I suppose I have become a sort of living monument in Portugal. But I come from a family with roots all over the world, so the idea of patriotism is not very strong in me. My country is the country of Chekhov, Beethoven, Velasquez - writers I like, painters and artists I admire.
The greatest destroyer of love and peace is abortion, which is war against the child. The mother doesn't learn to love, but kills to solve her own problems. Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want.
I believe in any country, matters that relate to its territory would, of course, provoke strong sentiments amongst the people of that country.
We need a dose of doubt and a dose of faith, to challenge each other.
There are few writers of note, of any country or of any age, from whom quotations might not be made in proof of the love with which they regarded Nature.
Depression is not generalized pessimism, but pessimism specific to the effects of one's own skilled action.
The pessimism that protests and defends itself cannot be truly said to be pessimism.
In modern pharmacology it's so clear that even if you have a fixed dose of a drug, the individuals respond very differently to one and the same dose.
If one person sits down at their computer one day and types one word, dose that affect the future? If that one person didn't type that one word, would the future's history be changed? Dose their one word even mean anything? Dose my one (times a lot) word mean anything? Dose that one person's one word even get read-once? If I wasn't sitting here writing my words, would my future be different?
Now make no mistake, I think we need a strong dose of fiscal conservatism in Washington, D.C.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!