A Quote by Miguel de Unamuno

If a philosopher is not a man, he is anything but a philosopher; he is above all a pedant, and a pedant is a caricature of a man. — © Miguel de Unamuno
If a philosopher is not a man, he is anything but a philosopher; he is above all a pedant, and a pedant is a caricature of a man.
The scholar without good breeding is a pedant; the philosopher, a cynic.
I have always taken as the standard of the mode of teaching and writing, not the abstract, particular, professional philosopher, but universal man, that I have regarded man as the criterion of truth, and not this or that founder of a system, and have from the first placed the highest excellence of the philosopher in this, that he abstains, both as a man and as an author, from the ostentation of philosophy, i. e., that he is a philosopher only in reality, not formally, that he is a quiet philosopher, not a loud and still less a brawling one.
Never argue with a pedant over nomenclature. It wastes your time and annoys the pedant.
Thus, I blush to add, you can not be a philosopher and a good man, though you may be a philosopher and a great one.
The unlettered man who prayed to his maker would be heard; the pedant reciting a faultless invocation would be ignored.
The scholar may lose himself in schools, in words, and become a pedant; but when he comprehends his duties, he above all men is arealist, and converses with things.
He who studies without passion will never become anything more than a pedant.
The difference between Christian thinking and the non-Christian philosopher has always been at this point. The non-Christian philosopher has always said that man is normal now, but biblical Christianity says he is abnormal now.
A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it.
In fact, philosophy is universal in scope. No man can live without a world view; therefore, there is no man who is not a philosopher.
The great man of science, unless he is also a philosopher, ... deserves the title of genius as little as the man of action.
'But the man who is ready to taste every form of knowledge, is glad to learn and never satisfied - he's the man who deserves to be called a philosopher, isn't he?'
The philosopher proves that the philosopher exists. The poet merely enjoys existence.
The philosopher is not a citizen of any community of ideas, that is what makes him a philosopher.
If someone asks, ‘But what in the end is a philosopher?’ I would say ‘A philosopher is a human being who fights in theory.’
One can only become a philosopher, but not be one. As one believes he is a philosopher, he stops being one.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!