A Quote by Nawazuddin Siddiqui

I am ably balancing big and small films. With every big film I do, I try to take up films that are high on content and small on budget. — © Nawazuddin Siddiqui
I am ably balancing big and small films. With every big film I do, I try to take up films that are high on content and small on budget.
I wanted to try every style available to me - large productions, small productions, studio films, low-budget. You just can't sit around and wait for every big-budget film to come along.
Alternate between short films, long form films, with or without stars, small budget or big budget films. Basically a filmmaker needs to be flexible.
I can't afford to wait for big films. So I take up small films as they provide maximum exposure.
Multiplexes are being very unkind to small films. They are giving a lot more space and value to the big budget films rather than distributing show timings fairly. But that fight will go on.
There are two types of films - one made by the big-time producers, the other is low budget stuff made by some producers who make films for the heck of it, they complete their films for small amounts, sell it at low costs with almost no publicity.
Small films, made on shoe-string budget work in big centres, and for that a substantial amount of budget should be set aside for marketing.
Many films you see in theaters are financed through outside sources. With big films, the studio will pay, hoping to reap the reward of their big bet. But with medium and small-sized films, outside production companies and financiers often foot the bill.
The Cannes film festival is about big-budget films but also remarkable films made in different political regimes by film-makers with little resources.
Sometimes we postpone releases because of another big film or some other reasons. In the end, the big film, too, postpones, and the impact is on the small films. So once you decide on a release date, you have to go ahead with it.
When you're making under-million-dollar films, it becomes so much about actors' availability. When you're using big actors for small films, you're in second or third position to the big monoliths.
The bigger the budget, the less an audience is trusted, and that's the difference between a big-budget film and a small-budget film.
I hope I'm always lucky enough to be able to work in theater, TV, and big films and small films. I think there's advantages and disadvantages to all of them. The fact that this was a small film without much money and without much time made it rich in energy and momentum and drive when we were actually making it 'cause that's all you've got. You've just got the story and the people.
Sometimes, big budget movies with big stars also flop, and sometimes small films manage to win the heart of audiences. Ultimately, it is the viewer who is the king and it depends on the liking of the audiences.
I love being able to change from big films to small films.
I personally just want to do as many different things as I can do, whether it's comedy, drama, science fiction, horror, narrator... You've got a documentary, I've got a voice. Animated films. Big films, small films.
I request big films to give way for small movies as there are umpteen number of such films waiting to see the light of the day.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!