A Quote by Noam Chomsky

A lot of countries break (or go against) the international law. — © Noam Chomsky
A lot of countries break (or go against) the international law.
The idea of self-determination was gradually given credibility by international law, and it lent strong emancipatory support to movements of liberation struggling against a West-centric world order. Latin American countries used international law creatively, both to limit the protection of foreign investment by establishing the primacy of national sovereignty in relation to natural resources, and by building support for the norm on non-intervention in internal affairs.
It is impossible for us to break the law. We can only break ourselves against the law.
The case against the notion of historical objectivity is like the case against international law, or international morality; that it does not exist.
We're learning a lot from large international competitors... As we go international, we're looking to add something unique to the market. And so when we do go international, it won't just be as a taxi service.
I think 'A' sides are extremely important, as close as you can get to international cricket. You are often playing against internationals from different countries and it definitely bridges the gap between our domestic game and international cricket.
The partisan wants to change the law, the criminal break it; the anarch wants neither. He is not for or against the law. While not acknowledging the law, he does try to recognize it like the laws of nature, and he adjusts accordingly.
As long as Palestinian violence exists, but not a Palestinian state, Israel is in danger, because it cannot obtain assistance from the international community against an entity that is not subordinate to international law.
If however the law is so promulgated that it of necessity makes you an agent of injustices against another, then I say to you ... break the law.
If you say that your national law allows you to do something, it is fine as long as you do this inside your own territory. As long as you go international, you really have to be sure that there is an international law which you respect and which you follow.
But they don't use law-they use law for their interests. They don't go by law, international, federal, local-nothing! They go by whatever is expedient to protect the interests that are at stake.
I had been brought up in the law and had this sort of instinct that international law operates and was there to protect principles and not to be the plaything of power and might - which I now know, of course, to be an absolute nonsense. International law should be spelled l-o-r-e.
The security of which we speak is to be attained by the development of international law through an international organization based on the principles of law and justice.
All civilised countries should unite in the fight against international terrorism.
I would apply international law and I think we need to be a force for international law.
I deal with foreign countries. I made a lot of money dealing against China. I've made a lot of money dealing against many other countries.
Historically, international law lent a measure of legality to the colonial system, and allowed the West to set the rules for participation as a sovereign state on a global level. It also protected the interests of foreign investment in countries of the global South even when these were exploitative, and deprived countries of the benefits of resources situated within their territories.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!