A Quote by Park Geun-hye

I believe that it is an unchanging value of democracy that ends cannot justify the means in politics. — © Park Geun-hye
I believe that it is an unchanging value of democracy that ends cannot justify the means in politics.
Life is nothing in itself. It’s a place marker that proves who’s winning, and we are the winners. We are always the winners. There is nothing but the winning. Even winning means nothing. We win because it’s an insult to lose. The ends don’t justify the means. The means don’t justify the ends. There is no one to justify to. There is no justice.” ~ Durzo Blint
Does the end justify the means? Or should it be, Do the ends justify the mean; do the extremes justify moderation?
Your policy should be a mixture between your interests and how you reach your ends, but based on values. It cannot be only the end justifies the means, because for the criminals, ends justify the means, for thieves, for every illegal and immoral action, the end justifies the means.
I understand that the end does not justify the means. And this should be a lasting value for democracy.
Evil is not likely to result where people firmly believe that ends do not justify the means.
All that socialism means to me, to be very frank with you, is democracy with a small 'd.' I believe in democracy, and by democracy, I mean that, to as great an extent as possible, human beings have the right to control their own lives. And that means that you cannot separate the political structure from the economic structure.
A Warrior knows that the ends do not justify the means. Because there are no ends, there are only means.
In the final analysis, means and ends must cohere because the end is preexistent in the means, and, ultimately, destructive means cannot bring about constructive ends.
But the nature of the universe is such that ends can never justify means. On the contrary, the means always determine the end.
The ends do not justify the means
And violence is impractical, because the old eye for an eye philosophy ends up leaving everybody blind .. It is immoral because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for everybody. Means and ends are inseparable. The means represent the ideal in the making; in the long run of history destructive means cannot bring about constructive ends.
The ends must justify the means.
If the ends don't justify the means, what does?
If the ends don't justify the means, then what does?
I never think the ends justify the means.
I think in general the ends do not justify the means.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!