A Quote by Park Geun-hye

I understand that the end does not justify the means. And this should be a lasting value for democracy. — © Park Geun-hye
I understand that the end does not justify the means. And this should be a lasting value for democracy.
Does the end justify the means? Or should it be, Do the ends justify the mean; do the extremes justify moderation?
Does the end justify the means? That is possible. But what will justify the end? To that question, which historical thought leaves pending, rebellion replies: the means.
I believe that it is an unchanging value of democracy that ends cannot justify the means in politics.
If the end does not justify the means - what can?
Do not turn yourself from an end into a means-one does not justify the other.
We are so anxious to achieve some particular end that we never pay attention to the psycho-physical means whereby that end is to be gained. So far as we are concerned, any old means is good enough. But the nature of the universe is such that ends can never justify the means. On the contrary, the means always determine the end.
Your policy should be a mixture between your interests and how you reach your ends, but based on values. It cannot be only the end justifies the means, because for the criminals, ends justify the means, for thieves, for every illegal and immoral action, the end justifies the means.
I want us to organize, to tell the personal stories that create empathy, which is the most revolutionary emotion. The truth of the mater is that hierarchy and violence can't be remedied by more hierarchy and violence. The end doesn't justify the means, the means we choose decide the end we get. The means are the end.
The end does not justify the means. No one's rights can be secured by the violation of the rights of others.
I see is that there are many people who destroy their marriages because of one-night stands with someone else. And as the French say, "C'est ne pas grave." It's not something easy to swallow, but at the same time, it does not justify you to end a long-lasting relationship because something happened.
Our alliances should be understood as a means to expand our influence, not as a constraint on our power. The expansion of democracy and freedom in the world should be a shared interest and value with all nations.
The end does not justify the means. If we try to be someone we are not in order to achieve a result, then the result cannot help but be something other than what we intended.
The modern meaning of life's end-when does it end? How does it end? How should it end? What is the value of life? How do we measure it?
One must always say every word with consideration, and should not say what one does not wish to happen. Those who do not understand the value of suggestion walk after their own fate with a whip in their hand, and those who understand its value and control their word and use it rightly, they are a bliss to themselves and a source of happiness to others.
But the nature of the universe is such that ends can never justify means. On the contrary, the means always determine the end.
The end may justify the means as long as there is something that justifies the end.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!