A Quote by Pat Robertson

There's no question that jihad historically means war. — © Pat Robertson
There's no question that jihad historically means war.
'Jihad' can mean holy war to extremists, but it means struggle to the average Muslim.
Jewish fundamentalism is teaching that Jews can fight with guns and with civil war, against being relocated off the West Bank, and disobey the orders of their government. That is the call to jihad, to several kinds of jihad.
No one in al-Nahda believes that jihad is a way to impose Islam on the world. But we believe that jihad is self-control, is social and political struggle, and even military jihad is only a way to defend oneself in the case of aggression.
Islamic terrorism is not common crime but an act of war. Jihad is war. For the Jihadi it is a war; we must also accept it as such. Home grown Muslim militants must be treated, not just as enemy combatants but as traitors.
Historically, war journalists have embedded themselves with one side, which means the greatest threat comes from the clearly delineated enemy of that side.
This too is a jihad. Yet we Americans find ourselves in the dangerous position of going to war not against a state but against a phantom. The jihad we have embarked upon is targeting an elusive and protean enemy. The battle we have begun is never-ending. But it may be too late to wind back the heady rhetoric. We have embarked on a campaign as quixotic as the one mounted to destroy us.
A professional soldier understands that war means killing people, war means maiming people, war means families left without fathers and mothers.
Are we fighting too many wars? And I would say no. We're fighting one war. And it's a war against radical Islamic Jihad.
Jihad should be waged in places where there is war. Bombings in places where there is no war is not a good thing.
Jihad is described as a war against Muslims, to establish the religion.
There's a basis for the war, historically, in the 'Hunger Games,' which would be the third servile war, which was Spartacus' war, where you have a man who is a slave who is then turned into a gladiator who broke out of the gladiator school and led a rebellion and then became the face of the war.
For many foreign fighters, the jihad in Iraq and Syria is a commuter war.
Jihad expands Islam's domain by any means available.
Jihad is misused by fundamentalists. The Quranic meaning is not meant for war at all, in the sense of killing.
Jihad amongst the Muslims today has become like a taboo subject that is discussed over coffee. The one who writes and speaks about Jihad has not even spent a minute in the battlefield.
In philosophy it is always good to put a question instead of an answer to a question. For an answer to the philosophical question may easily be unfair; disposing of it by means of another question is not.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!