A Quote by Paul Newman

Building weapons that we don't need, don't work, and aren't necessary, and have no mission ? that's not bad politics, that's robbery. — © Paul Newman
Building weapons that we don't need, don't work, and aren't necessary, and have no mission ? that's not bad politics, that's robbery.
Building a mission and building a business go hand in hand. The primary thing that excites me is the mission. But we have always had a healthy understanding that we need to do both.
Building a mission and building a business go hand-in-hand. It is true that the primary thing that makes me excited about what we're doing is the mission, but I also think, from the very beginning, we've had this healthy understanding which is that we need to do both.
You've got the North Koreans building weapons; you got the Iranians building weapons. You've got - the Pakistanis already have at least 100 nuclear weapons. Do you think there's any serious effort in this country to come to grips with that?
Politics is different, because the mission is always to get the necessary votes. A good politician goes through everything in terms of mission and vision, and resourcing, but at the end of the day politicians have to make compromises in order to achieve consensus.
I don't want to use the term "nuclear weapons" because those people in Iran who have authority say they are not building nuclear weapons. I make an appeal to the countries who do have nuclear weapons. They don't consider them a nuclear threat. But let's say a country that doesn't have nuclear weapons gets involved in building them, then they are told by those that already have nuclear weapons that they oppose [such a development]. Where is the justice in that?
Our mission was to make sure that the bad guys, basically, did not get nuclear weapons.
Politics and more politics - that's how you work towards the building of agreements.
Taxation is robbery based on monopoly of weapons
Iran is not about building nuclear weapons. We don't wanna build nuclear weapons. We don't believe that nuclear weapons bring security to anybody, certainly not to us.
politics were as bad as mathematics, and that the mission of politicians seemed to be calling each other names
If we do our deficit spending on weapons, at least we get weapons. Then if we need weapons, we have them. If we don't need them, no harm is done.
We are not engaged in domestic politics, in church building or in social uplift work, but we are engaged in nation building.
Not all negativity is bad. In politics, it's a necessary clarifying tool.
Failed weapons tests are necessary components of the weapons development process.
It is my view that there is no sensible military use for nuclear weapons, whether "strategic" weapons, "tactical" weapons, "theatre" weapons, weapons at sea or weapons in space.
The purpose of nuclear weapons is to deter. The mission of deterrence to make all parties in possession of nuclear weapons never, ever use them.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!