A Quote by Paul Polman

We cannot choose between [economic] growth and sustainability - we must have both — © Paul Polman
We cannot choose between [economic] growth and sustainability - we must have both
One must choose between making a man or a citizen, for one cannot make both at the same time.
The first law of sustainability: population growth and/or growth in the rate of consumption of resources cannot be sustained
Economic growth is important. But we cannot count on economic growth alone to fund the public education system our children need and deserve.
Economic growth must be the central issue because it is only through growth that the devastating threat of national bankruptcy can be averted. Furthermore, it is only by reviving American economic growth that the West's global predominance can be sustained, and peace and freedom kept secure around the world.
I want Canada to be the country that is the best in the world at combining economic growth, social justice and environmental sustainability.
CEOs need to produce continuous growth in sales and profits. Yet they must also invest in sustainability and social responsibility, which then leave them less money for financing their growth.
The world has also learned that economic growth, by itself, cannot close the gap between rich and poor.
We are told we must choose - the old or the new. In fact, we must choose both. What is a life if not a series of negotiations between the old and the new?
We can consider the process of healthy growth to be a never ending series of free choice situations, confronting each individual at every point throughout his life, in which he must choose between the delights of safety and growth, dependence and independence, regression and progression, immaturity and maturity.
The problem is, if at all, in the different view of the economy, of economic growth. Growth is too low, even for us. That needs to change: More investments, a stronger role by the European Central Bank. Otherwise, there are no tensions between Italy and Germany. But on this point, compromises must be reached and we will reach them.
If you had to pick between being moral and successful, obviously I'd choose to be moral. However if you can choose both, will you choose both? I'd say definitely.
Federal policies must understand the linkages between economic growth, social mobility, and a strong middle class.
Without environmental sustainability, economic stability and social cohesion cannot be achieved
Contrary to popular belief, we do not face a choice between economy and ecology, It is often said that protecting the environment would constrain or even undermine economic growth. In fact, the opposite is true: unless we protect resources and the earth's natural capital, we shall not be able to sustain economic growth.
Sustainability has become a religion in architecture - not that there's anything wrong with it - but I think it has to work both ways. Everyone thinks architecture has to be subservient to sustainability, but what if we thought in the other direction, like, what can sustainability do to make architecture more exciting?
Economic growth is the key. Economic growth is the key to everything. But once you have economic growth, it is important that we reach out to people who live in the shadows, the people who don't seem to ever think that they get a fair deal.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!