A Quote by Prateik Babbar

If an actor can emotionally bond with the viewer, then it does not matter if he is handsome or ordinary looking. — © Prateik Babbar
If an actor can emotionally bond with the viewer, then it does not matter if he is handsome or ordinary looking.
Art objects are inanimate sad bits of matter hanging in the dark when no one is looking. The artist only does half the work; the viewer has to come up with the rest, and it is by empowering the viewer that the miracle of art gains its force.
As a young actor, I was advised to bide my time. Back then, there weren't good roles for someone like me. There were handsome leading men and character actors for smaller supporting roles. But I was told to hang in there, and it was good advice. We're all character actors now. Even a handsome man is a character actor at my age.
The president [George W. Bush] broke his bond with the public. Once that bond was broken, he no longer had the capacity to talk to the American public. State of the Union addresses? It didn't matter. Legislative initiatives? It didn't matter. P.R.? It didn't matter. Travel? It didn't matter.
You have to strike hard from the beginning and create a depressurizing zone between the viewer's own life and the one onscreen. The creators of James Bond got it right: the attention-grabbing scene of each Bond movie is the very first one, before the opening credits.
One of the secrets of being a great photographic model, as it is for a great film actor, is that you let the camera in. It's an intimacy that the model or actor creates with the lens, that then transmits itself to the viewer.
That a viewer does not see what the artist intended does not make the composition a failure... In reality all artists speak first to themselves and then to an audience.
As an actor, you are always looking for something fresh and interesting and not ordinary.
The fact of the matter is that when you're in pain emotionally about your life, the color of your skin does not matter.
I was born an ordinary actor. I will die an ordinary actor. But I've persisted.
I defy any British actor to deny they've not stood in front of the mirror and said: 'Bond, James Bond.'
I'm not handsome enough to be James Bond. Maybe a villain, though.
I feel whatever an actor does on screen is something the actor 'does,' and what the director can do is to tell, talk or instruct. So, all the credit for an actor's performance goes to the actor alone.
As an actor, you're naked emotionally; you're revealing yourself emotionally.
I guess if you try to write with honesty and emotional truth, then that will resonate no matter what the age of the viewer.
I have always thought that the role of the film-maker is to present the argument persuasively, emotionally and coherently and then it is over to the viewer, they are either convinced or not convinced, moved or not moved and they decide whether they will take action or not.
It matters that we have balance and facts and push people when they need to be pushed so that we can give the accurate, fair, balanced piece to the viewer, and then it's up to the viewer to be the judge.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!