A Quote by Richard Flanagan

Generally, literary prizes are significant not for who the winner is but the discussion they create around books. — © Richard Flanagan
Generally, literary prizes are significant not for who the winner is but the discussion they create around books.
Literary prizes serve a purpose if they allow for discussion of books.
I'm not sure that the culture of literary prizes is always a good thing, but while there are literary prizes, it's nice to be nominated.
Only idiots or snobs ever really thought less of 'genre books' of course. There are stupid books and there are smart books. There are well-written books and badly written books. There are fun books and boring books. All of these distinctions are vastly more important than the distinction between the literary and the non-literary.
We need prizes as publishers... to focus attention on books, for people to know what to go look for. But often in my opinion and in probably everyone's opinion, the right books don't get chosen. Still we need books to be chosen even if they are not exactly the right ones, otherwise many people won't know what to read. As a publisher, I feel prizes are important for the publishing business. But as a writer, I think, writers shouldn't get too distracted by prizes because very often they don't go to the right person. You shouldn't take it too seriously if you haven't won a prize.
Blogging has helped create an expanded awareness of the creative nonfiction genre, generally. But I suspect many bloggers continue to be unaware that they are (or have the potential to be) "literary" or "artful."
I've been very lucky with prizes. But the thing about prizes is that, when you talk about a prize-winning author, you can be talking about one that is well-regarded but doesn't sell any books.
My grandfather and mother were school teachers, so there was always some discussion around books.
The book trade invented literary prizes to stimulate sales, not to reward merit.
Theres always an anxiety about playing literary characters because one of the great joys of reading books is that you can create your own vision of things.
There's always an anxiety about playing literary characters because one of the great joys of reading books is that you can create your own vision of things.
On the £20,000 Mercedes prizes for each winner at the World Athletics Championships in Stuttgart- Anyone good enough to win already has one.
I am, of course, greatly honoured to win the Booker, which is one of the great literary prizes in the world.
What I want is to create a discussion about what is happening around the world and to provoke some debate with these pictures. Nothing more than this.
So much of the way books get classified has to do with marketing decisions. I think it's more useful to think of literary books and sci-fi/fantasy books as existing on a continuum.
We don't want to create a literary ghetto in which black writers are only allowed to write black characters and women writers are put on 'girl books.'
I read reviews and consider myself pretty 'plugged in' to the literary cosmos, yet one of the things I love best about book-touring is the opportunity to compare notes with favorite booksellers around the country. I always come home with books by authors I'd never heard of - or books I've read about but didn't realize I might love.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!