A Quote by Richard Jefferies

It would seem that the ant works its way tentatively, and, observing where it fails, tries another place and succeeds. — © Richard Jefferies
It would seem that the ant works its way tentatively, and, observing where it fails, tries another place and succeeds.
I'm the type of guy who fails and fails and fails, and then, as if failure has become sick of him, succeeds.
People respond to a guy who is trapped and succeeds on some level and fails on another.
I don't want to be the crazy woman who does it for years and years and years, and tries and fails and tries and fails and tries and fails, but I can swim from Cuba to Florida, and I will swim from Cuba to Florida.
This is what metaphor is. It is not saying that an ant is an elephant. Perhaps; both are alive. No. Metaphor is saying the ant is an elephant. Now, logically speaking, I know there is a difference. If you put elephants and ants before me, I believe that every time I will correctly identify the elephant and the ant. So metaphor must come from a very different place than that of the logical, intelligent mind. It comes from a place that is very courageous, willing to step out of our preconceived ways of seeing things and open so large that it can see the oneness in an ant and in an elephant.
We have the right to rid our houses of ants; but what we have no right to do is to forget to honor the ant as God made it, out in the place where God made the ant to be. When we meet the ant on the sidewalk, we step over him. He is a creature, like ourselves; not made in the image of God, it is true, but equal with man as far as creation is concerned. The ant and the man are both creatures.
The popular distinction between 'constructive' and 'destructive' criticism is a sentimentality: the mind too weak to perceive in what respects the bad fails is not strong enough to appreciate in what the good succeeds. To be without discrimination is to be unable to praise. The critic who lets you know that he always looks for something to like in works he discusses is not telling you anything about the works or about art; he is saying 'see what a nice person I am.
I like the fact that by mimicking the way memory works, a writer can actually write in a fluid way - one solid scene doesn't have to fall on another solid scene, you can just have a fragment that then dovetails into another one that took place 30 years apart from it.
Prayer succeeds when all else fails
Gentle persuasion succeeds where force fails.
When lack of structure fails, it fails all at once. What works totally fine from 0-20 employees, is disastrous at 30.
There’s different ways to be impacted by truth. One is to read the scriptures. Another is to read other works by other people who have read the scriptures, non fiction for example. Another is to do studies. Another is to go to a place of worship. Another thing is to sit and listen to someone who’s speaking. There’s all kinds of ways. Another way is to write. About the truth. Discover the struggle through your character.
A man who fails well is greater than one who succeeds badly.
Audacity succeeds as often as it fails; in life it has an even chance.
The song succeeds or fails just based on whether you argue your point successfully. I like throwing images together, which create meaning if you listen to it one time, but if you listen to it another time you might get a different meaning.
Ultimately every trick succeeds or fails with an audience because of its plot.
The only reward to be expected from literature is contempt if one fails and hatred if one succeeds.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!