A Quote by Robert A. Heinlein

The brown monkey's instinct to kill is correct; such men are dangerous to all monkey customs. — © Robert A. Heinlein
The brown monkey's instinct to kill is correct; such men are dangerous to all monkey customs.
Charles Darwin wrote a famous book in 18 [gibberish]. And that book was an interesting book, cuz it was called "Monkey-Monkey-Monkey-Monkey-Monkey-Monkey-You".
Monkeys are superior to men in this: when a monkey looks into a mirror, he sees a monkey.
My dream pet? I like a couple of them, man: monkey, I love dogs. See, tigers, I don't know - I can't be playing with something like that. A monkey, I can handle it. A dog, yeah; I would get a monkey.
Let's do it. Monkeys are always funny. You pretty much can't go wrong with a monkey, right? Hi paused. Well unless that monkey wants you dead, or does needle drugs or something. Then it's wrong, and a bad monkey.
What I love about the way they both [Paul Thomas Anderson and Joaquin Phoenix] work is that all of the monkey business is on film. There's no monkey business outside of the monkey business of making the movie. There's no ego bullshit, there's no wasted energy. It's all directed at the story and that's rare.
I'm less upset with politicians than the media. I feel like politicians, there is a certain, inherent - you know, the way I always explain it is, when you go to the zoo and a monkey throws its feces, it's a monkey. But, when the zookeeper is standing right there, and he doesn't say bad monkey... Somebody's got to be the zookeeper.
I can train a monkey to wave an American flag. That does not make the monkey patriotic.
Hello," Magnus said to the monkey. The monkey did not reply. "I shall call you Ragnor.
Nobody can make a monkey out of anyone who isn't a monkey to start with.
As is often the case with children, the rule of 'monkey see, monkey do' plays out in the workplace. It's hard to be good role model, and it's one of the greatest challenges of leadership.
A mathematician who can only generalise is like a monkey who can only climb up a tree, and a mathematician who can only specialise is like a monkey who can only climb down a tree. In fact neither the up monkey nor the down monkey is a viable creature. A real monkey must find food and escape his enemies and so must be able to incessantly climb up and down. A real mathematician must be able to generalise and specialise.
Distraction is the main problem for us all - what the Buddha called the monkey mind. We need to tame this monkey mind.
Of course there is a monkey. There is always a monkey.
I am not nearly so interested in what monkey man was derived from as I am in what kind of monkey he is to become.
To put it crudely but graphically, the monkey who did not have a realistic perception of the tree branch he jumped for was soon a dead monkey-and therefore did not become one of our ancestors.
With the tiger you're always on edge, and you always have to keep your distance. The monkey is far less threatening so you're more relaxed around the monkey, and I think that's actually hazardous.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!