A Quote by Ron DeSantis

Americans of all political background overwhelmingly support term limits, yet term limits have floundered in Congress. — © Ron DeSantis
Americans of all political background overwhelmingly support term limits, yet term limits have floundered in Congress.
An approach that phases in congressional term limits reconciles the self-interest of members of Congress with the public's desire to see these changes enacted and gives us the best chance to make term limits a reality.
I would like to believe I would not have behaved differently had I not made a term limits pledge, but my own frailties and human desire for prestige and position tell me my term limits pledge did make a difference in how I approached my job in Congress.
You know, you look at term limits, you poll term limits, 70, 80 percent of Republicans or Democrats are for it.
I can see both sides of term limits, and I think, in different positions, term limits make more sense than in some others.
Because terms limits are so popular, the interest of a member of Congress in staying in office would be congruent with supporting my term limits joint resolution.
I fundamentally believe in term limits, for Congress, presidents, and board members.
As a lobbyist, I was completely against term limits, and I know a lot of people are against term limits, and I was one of the leaders, because why? As a lobbyist, once you buy a congressional office, you don't have to re-buy that office in six years, right?
Term limits would make Congress bolder, more independent, and less risk-averse.
As I stated shortly after retiring from the U.S. Army and first pursuing a seat in Congress in 2010, I planned to self-impose term limits.
I believe in term limits. I believe the country would be hugely better off if we had more turnover in Congress.
A constitutional amendment for congressional term limits could never achieve the blessing of Congress; it could be initiated only by the states.
Under my contract with the American voter, we are proposing a series of ethics reforms on day one to end government corruption. They include a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress.
It's a lot easier to see, at least in some cases, what the long-term limits of the possible will be, because they depend on natural law. But it's much harder to see just what path we will follow in heading toward those limits.
Asking an incumbent member of Congress to vote for term limits is a bit like asking a chicken to vote for Colonel Sanders.
One: balance the budget now, not later. Two: Get Americans jobs by ending illegal immigration and making legal immigration harder. Lastly: Impose term limits.
What are the "maximum" limits of acceptance of the term "intellectual"?
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!