A Quote by Sam Altman

Every thing at a startup gets modeled after the founders. Whatever the founders do becomes the culture. — © Sam Altman
Every thing at a startup gets modeled after the founders. Whatever the founders do becomes the culture.
By maintaining an active feedback system at every stage of a startup, founders can reduce their burn rate, increase their virality coefficient, and retain key hires.
Most people are average. Founders are not. Founders' traits seem to have an inverse normal distribution to them.
If I didn't believe in rooting for founders and investing in founders, I'd be a bit of a hypocrite.
More important than starting any startup, is getting to know a lot of potential co-founders.
I was disappointed in how [Bill] Clinton, like [Jimmy] Carter, used the founders to argue for huge expansions in federal power, clearly beyond what the founders could have ever conceived.
There is a long history of founders returning to companies and doing great things. Founders are able to set the vision for their companies with an authority no one else can.
One thing that founders forget is that after they hire employees, they have to retain them.
In [Ronald] Reagan's view, the American Founders had anchored their experiment in Judeo-Christian beliefs; the Bolsheviks deliberately established an antithetical model. Those founders of communism divorced their "faith" from God.
Founders need sizable egos to believe that what they are creating is good enough to change the world. What makes for great co-founders is having those egos focused on complementary, not competing, skills.
One of the things that's so interesting when talking to minority founders specifically is that there is really a knowledge gap in understanding what the risk-reward profile is for doing a startup.
The best founders are extremely thoughtful and have an eye for quality. I don't know if there's any generic advice here that would be helpful. Startup knowledge is a moving target.
It turns out that one of the biggest drivers of investors are both successful and non-successful startup founders.
I felt that we could hardly improve on the conception of the university expressed by one of the founders of the modern system, Wilhelm von Humboldt, also one of the founders of classical liberalism. That seems to me true today as well, though ideals of course have to be adapted to changing circumstances.
The first time I went through YC, it was smaller, and the founders were younger. The advantage of that was that the set of founders who were older than us had really seen the Web 1.0 meltdown. They brought that knowledge to us.
We hear again and again from founders, that they wish they had waited to start a startup until they came up with an idea they really loved.
Startups are often best at solving the personal problems of their founders. The more diverse the founders, the more types of problems can be solved - and the more people who will be positively impacted by technology.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!