A Quote by Sam Darnold

Interviewing people is hard. — © Sam Darnold
Interviewing people is hard.

Quote Topics

It's the rejection that is hard. It's not the interviewing that's hard. It's not the photography that's hard. It's, you know, approaching people all day long and having a good portion of those people reject you and some of them be rude.
When I'm interviewing people, the way I bond with them is by encouraging them to complain about how hard their day is.
It must be hard interviewing actors.
I was very nervous interviewing Genesis on Radio 2. I felt out of my depth and somebody tweeted afterwards: Sara Cox interviewing Genesis - what a waste. I was crushed, because I kind of knew it was true.
In China, because Chinese is a tonal language, it can be kind of hard to follow people's emotional tracks. There was one moment where a woman I was interviewing just sort of burst into tears, and I can usually sort of tell when things are coming on, and in that moment, it was very unexpected.
Most rock journalism is people who can't write, interviewing people who can't talk, for people who can't read.
Interviewing people is pretty natural for me.
I'm also interviewing a guy who's just written a book about his experience living in Iraq, faced with the type of violence as he said, an unimaginable scale. And I think that the combination of that is very hard to shake.
I've had the privilege of meeting and/or interviewing most of the top metal and hard rock artists at various points in my career and sharing their stories and music with millions of fans on air through TV and radio.
I am really bad at actually interviewing people.
My policy with interviewing is I'm not there to teach the people I'm across from a lesson.
Interviewers have to be work really hard to be good. They¹re more inclined to be bad. Generally, they can go either way, but interviewing on a whole isn¹t such a useful thing. I¹m not a big fan of (interviews), really.
So often on CNN, there's a world-class journalist interviewing campaign rejects and ideologues and silly, craven people who do not care about informing people, that aren't there to help people understand what's going on in the news.
I don't think interviewing people is any different than normal communication.
One of the great challenges of being a modern historian is interviewing multiple people who were all there for something, some event. No one's version matches up 100% with other people's, even if it's three or four people on a conference call.
I believe it's easier to be an actor. Somehow, interviewing seems to be intrusive on people's lives.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!