It's been my experience, Langford, that the past always has a way of returning. Those who don't learn, or can't remember it, are doomed to repeat it.
Those unable to catalog the past are doomed to repeat it.
You know that old phrase ‘Those who don’t remember the past are condemned to repeat it’? Well, I think those who remember the past are even worse off.
He who forgets the past is doomed to repeat it.
Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Those who don't remember the past are condemned to repeat the eleventh grade.
Those who cannot condemn the past repeat it in order to remember it.
I've got news for Mr. Santayana: we're doomed to repeat the past no matter what. That's what it is to be alive.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it without a sense of ironic futility.
Santayana's aphorism must be reversed: too often it is those who can remember the past who are condemned to repeat it.
Thus through half-belief, we are often doomed to repeat that very past we should have learned from.
Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Those who know nothing about history are doomed forever to repeat it.
No statement is more true and better applicable to Wall Street than the famous warning of Santayana: "Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it".
We're doomed to repeat the past no matter what. That's what it is to be alive. It's pretty dense kids who haven't figured that out by the time they're ten.... Most kids can't afford to go to Harvard and be misinformed.