I don't mind doing glamorous roles, comic roles, weekly shows, or something different from what I've done earlier.
I don't choose characters according to looks. I'm comfortable doing both glamorous and non-glamorous roles.
If you think about my filmography, I have never done a movie that a kid could go see, except for 'Iron Giant,' and I'm not even on the screen.
If you think about my filmography, I have never done a movie that a kid could go see, except for Iron Giant, and I'm not even on the screen.
I probably marketed myself all wrong. I had exotic looks; I should have done those glamorous roles that exuded 'oomph.' But in my head, I was always an actress first.
Honestly, I'm willing to experiment with far more variety in roles than I'm given. But ultimately, it's the producer's decision. But, I've done a variety of roles - the evil don, the evil husband... I've done villainous roles, supporting roles, etc.
If one goes by my filmography, I have done several films of different genres.
I never get the tall, blonde, glamorous roles because I'm not tall, blonde and glamorous. I'm more the wee, disturbing characters because of the way I look or sound.
Most of my popular movies have seen me cast in serious roles. But then I am mostly offered such roles.
Till now I have mostly done the glam roles. But I do look forward to work for films which will give me more scope to perform as an actor.
I look back at my filmography, and I'm pretty jazzed with the stuff I've been part of. They're all movies I'd like to see.
I am sexy and I like playing glamorous roles.
I've been on the lookout for meaningful roles, not just the glamorous ones.
I have always played strong, sexy and glamorous roles.
Post 'Pink,' I don't have any film which I can pick out from my filmography and say 'It would have been better if I hadn't done this film.'
I don't want to be typecast as a heroine doing just glamorous roles.