A Quote by Sooraj Pancholi

The first film always chooses you, but you choose the second one. — © Sooraj Pancholi
The first film always chooses you, but you choose the second one.
I always liked the idea in 'Potter' that you don't choose the wand, the wand chooses you, and that relics decide when you're ready to handle them. I'm a cinephile first and a filmmaker second, and it's all swimming in the subconscious.
You choose the film, and then the film chooses everyone else; a film decides everything on its own.
I'd say the film to avoid is a director's second film, particularly if his first film was a big success. The second film is where you've really needed to have learned something.
The first film is very important, and one needs to choose the right kind of debut project. I also think the second film is equally important, as it needs to be a notch higher.
I have always believed that the choice of your second film is as important as you first film.
You are always free to choose what you do first, what you do second, and what you do not do at all
We all choose things, and we also all choose against things. I want to be the kind of person who chooses for more than chooses against.
If I have to choose between a Bollywood film and Pakistan film, it may sound cliched, but I will go with the script first. And if both the scripts are equally good, then I will choose a Pakistan film.
I am an actress. My first film was a Telugu film, my second film was Bollywood, and third was Indo-Chinese.
if you love two people at the same time, choose the second. Because if you really loved the first one, you wouldn't have fallen for the second.
Do not despair when in spite of intense supplication, there is a delay in receiving the expected gift. He has guaranteed that he will respond in what He chooses for you, and not what you choose for yourself, and at the time He chooses not the time you desire.
I am always content with what happens; for I know that what God chooses is better than what I choose.
Usually, with me, the project is always the second thing. The film-maker comes first. Films grow out of the relationship.
There is first the literature of knowledge, and secondly, the literature of power. The function of the first is--to teach; the function of the second is--to move, the first is a rudder, the second an oar or a sail. The first speaks to the mere discursive understanding; the second speaks ultimately, it may happen, to the higher understanding or reason, but always through affections of pleasure and sympathy.
I've always believed that it's the film that chooses the actor and not the other way round.
I don't know that a movie like Doctor Strange couldn't have been the second or third film we made. I don't think we're doing anything in that requires past viewing, as opposed to Civil War which we wouldn't have done as the first or second movie because so much of that film is based on the pre-existing relationships between the characters.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!