A Quote by Steve Jobs

Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower. — © Steve Jobs
Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower.
Innovation distinguishes a leader from a follower.
My dad taught me to be a leader or a follower, and he said follower ain't fun. So I want to be the leader of Bubba Watson.
I’ve been involved in a number of cults both as a leader and a follower. You have more fun as a follower but you make more money as a leader.
Moral authority is another way to define servant leadership because it represents a reciprocal choice between leader and follower. If the leader is principle centered, he or she will develop moral authority. If the follower is principle centered, he or she will follow the leader. In this sense, both leaders and followers are followers. Why? They follow truth. They follow natural law. They follow principles. They follow a common, agreed-upon vision. They share values. They grow to trust one another.
The first follower is actually an underestimated form of leadership in itself. … The first follower is what transforms a lone nut into a leader.
As a government leader, I'm not going to sit on the sidelines and watch all these other sectors innovate. I'm going to do everything I can as a leader to be in that innovation, to be a provocateur for that innovation.
If leadership is, fundamentally, about serving others, then any one person should be able to move between being a "leader" and a "follower."
Loyalty to the leader reaches its highest peak when the follower has personally grown through the mentorship of the leader.
Intellect distinguishes between the possible and the impossible; reason distinguishes between the sensible and the senseless. Even the possible can be senseless.
I'm a trendsetter. I'm a leader, not a follower.
The follower is as important as the leader.
Often, in a given project team or network, one sees leadership roles shifting among various members at various times. Attempts to fit these into traditional views of "leader" and "follower" don't quite work. It's more like Twitter: the "leader" has "followers" - but the "followers" are empowered to alter the relationship unilaterally, and the "leader" must continually earn the consent of the "followers."
I think we have to rethink the concept of “leader.” 'Cause “leader” implies “follower.” And, so many- not so many, but I think we need to appropriate, embrace the idea that we are the leaders we've been looking for.
To be an excellent leader, you have to be a superb follower.
I'm no leader; I'm a little humble follower.
You have to learn to be a follower before you become a leader.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!