A Quote by Steven Furtick

The difference between a vision and a daydream is the audacity to act. — © Steven Furtick
The difference between a vision and a daydream is the audacity to act.
Mothers know the difference between a broth and a consommé. And the difference between damask and chintz. And the difference between vinyl and Naugahyde. And the difference between a house and a home. And the difference between a romantic and a stalker. And the difference between a rock and a hard place.
The difference between a vision and a hallucination is that other people can see the vision.
You know what the difference between a vision and a hallucination is? They call it a vision when other people can see it.
every choice has its obverse, that is to say a renunciation, and so there is no difference between the act of choosing and the act of renouncing
The difference between Pound and Whitman is not between the democrat who in deep distress could look hopefully toward the future and the fascist madly in love with the past. It is that between the woodsman and the woodcarver. It is that between the mystic harking back to his vision and the artist whose first allegiance is to his craft, and so to the reality it presents.
If your vision doesn't cost you something, it's a daydream.
There is a difference between having a vision and suffering from a hallucination.
Between the vision and the act lies the shadow.
Ask yourself, 'What is obstructing my vision?' What is the difference between seeing and looking?
But we have to understand why we do what we do, not just do what we do. Vision without action is a daydream. Action without vision is a nightmare.
The difference between the Parthenon and the World Trade Center, between a French wine glass and a German beer mug, between Bach and John Philip Sousa, between Sophocles and Shakespeare, between a bicycle and a horse, though explicable by historical moment, necessity, and destiny, is before all a difference of imagination.
There's a difference between playing and playing games. The former is an act of joy, the latter — an act.
Audacity, more audacity, always audacity.
Audacity, and again, audacity, and always audacity.
If you think there's an important difference between being a Christian or a Jew or a Hindu or a Muslim or a Buddhist, then you're making a division between your heart, what you love with, and the way you act in the world.
Advocating the mere tolerance of difference between women is the grossest reformism. it is a total denial of the creative function of difference in our lives. Difference must be not merely toleration, but seen as a fund of necessary polarities between which our creativity can spark like a dialectic. Only then does the necessity for interdependency become unthreatening. Only within the interdependency of different strengths, acknowledged and equal, can the power to seek new ways of being in the world generate, as well as the courage and sustenance to act where there are no charters
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!