We say seeing is believing, but actually, we are much better at believing than at seeing. In fact, we are seeing what we believe all the time and occasionally seeing what we can't believe
Believing is seeing. It's much more effective than the old notion that seeing is believing.
You must understand that seeing is believing, but also know that believing is seeing.
There are those who say that seeing is believing. I am telling you that believing is seeing.
Knowledge, may it be said, is higher than magic and is more to be sought. It is quite possible to see what is happening and yet not know what is forward, for while seeing is believing, it does not follow that either seeing or believing is knowing.
They say seeing is believing, but the opposite is true. Believing is seeing.
The discrepancy or contradiction is the entire story. And being the entire story, it by itself discredits the entire twenty-six volumes of the Warren Commission. Nothing else has to be shown or even argued.
My work is largely concerned
with relations between
seeing and knowing,
seeing and saying,
seeing and believing.
For Conservatives, seeing is believing; for liberals, believing is seeing.
This is the real thing of disillusion that no one, not any one really is believing, seeing, understanding, thinking anything as you are thinking, believing, seeing, understanding such a thing.
So we must realize this: the suicidal framing story that dominates our world today has no power except the power we give it by believing it. Similarly, believing an alternative and transforming framing story may turn out to be the most radical thing any of us can ever do.
Vidal gives the impression of believing that the entire heterosexual edifice - registry offices, 'Romeo and Juliet,' the disposable diaper - is just a sorry story of self-hypnosis and mass hysteria: a hoax, a racket, or sheer propaganda.
How do we know what we know? Is seeing believing? Is believing seeing?
Seeing is believing and believing is knowing and knowing beats unknowing and the unknown.
He had the unlucky capacity many men have of seeing and believing in the possibility of goodness and truth, but of seeing the evil and falsehood of life too clearly to take any serious part in it.
Being psychic does not necessarily mean seeing an event that has not yet occurred. It is rather seeing the inner nature of something.