A Quote by Svetlana Alexievich

There is no need to give in to the compromise that totalitarian regimes always count on. — © Svetlana Alexievich
There is no need to give in to the compromise that totalitarian regimes always count on.
When totalitarian regimes are established, they at least have the illusion of the single-minded purpose. But once they establish the stature that's necessary for a totalitarian regime, they tend to flail.
I've always been fascinated by totalitarian regimes. I'm not an admirer of them.
Calls for the simplification of abstract or allusive art have always come from governments suspicious of artists themselves. This is why totalitarian regimes have always legislated some form of realism.
Few times in history do totalitarian or authoritarian regimes successfully repress their people for more than two generations, and zero times in history do these regimes last much longer than that, relatively speaking.
Sometimes compromise is important. Sometimes it's better to give in to someone else's wishes in order to have fun as a group or as a couple, or for the benefit of the team. Sometimes compromise is dangerous. We need to guard against compromising our standards to gain the approval or love of someone else. Decide when you can, and when you cannot, compromise. If it's not harmful and you are ambivalent about a decision, then compromise. If it could lead to breaking your values, compromise isn't a good idea.
I've opposed black regimes and white regimes, leftist regimes and rightist regimes. I'm close to Aristide because I have respect for him, but all that is beside the point.
The seeds of totalitarian regimes are nurtured by misery and want.
The real stumbling-block of totalitarian regimes is not the spiritual need of men for freedom of thought; it is men's inability to stand the physical and nervous strain of a permanent state of excitement, except during a few years of their youth.
Well, like in Orwell books, whom I cherish very much as an author, in classical totalitarian regimes, you always have to make people hate someone. And this hatred is all around the Russian politics.
The Fed has become an accomplice in the support of totalitarian regimes throughout the world.
There is an absolutely fundamental hostility on the part of totalitarian regimes toward religion.
Advances in the technology of telecommunications have proved an unambiguous threat to totalitarian regimes everywhere.
The history of totalitarian regimes is reflected in the evolution and perfection of the instruments of terror and more especially the police.
More people have been killed by totalitarian regimes, during times of peace, than in all the wars in the world combined.
Captains need to lead well and play within the laws of the game. There cannot be any compromise on that count.
If we haven't become the Liberty Party of an undoubted future, let us take this fact: the great totalitarian regimes have died. The Soviet Union broke up along ethnic lines, as we always thought it would. The Chinese - am I wrong? - are becoming a commercial civilization.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!