A Quote by Tahir Raj Bhasin

I have always believed that the choice of your second film is as important as you first film. — © Tahir Raj Bhasin
I have always believed that the choice of your second film is as important as you first film.
I'd say the film to avoid is a director's second film, particularly if his first film was a big success. The second film is where you've really needed to have learned something.
Your first film is always your best film, in a way. There's something about your first film that you never ever get back to, but you should always try. It's that slight sense of not knowing what you're doing, because the technical skills you learn - especially if you have a film that works, that has some kind of success - are beguiling. The temptation is to use them again, and they're not necessarily good storytelling techniques.
The first film is very important, and one needs to choose the right kind of debut project. I also think the second film is equally important, as it needs to be a notch higher.
After you've done the first feature, then you have heck of a difficult time getting your second film off the ground. They look at your first film and they say, "Oh well, we don't want you anymore."
I am an actress. My first film was a Telugu film, my second film was Bollywood, and third was Indo-Chinese.
If your first film does badly, there's no guarantee of the second film.
You go into the voting booths and you can rank your choices. So your first choice is an underdog that might not win, you know, that your choice number two, which might be your lesser evil, your safety choice, your vote is automatically reassigned from your first choice to your second choice if your first choice losses and there's not a majority winner. So it essentially eliminates, splitting it, eliminates having to vote your fear instead of your values.
I think it's important that your first film be your worst film, that one's life trajectory should go up.
I've always believed that if you want to really try and make a great film, not a good film, but a great film, you have to take a lot of risks.
As I talk to film students now especially, I say, "The easiest job you'll ever get is to try to make your first film." That's the easy one to get, is the first film because nobody knows whether you can make a film or not.
I have this theory that your first film is always your best film in some way. I always try to get back to that moment when you're not relying on things you've done before.
My first film was a big dud at the box office, and my second film did decently. I used to wonder how it would feel to have a hit film. I thought I'd be larger than life, but I'm not feeling anything I imagined. It's a completely different experience.
I have always believed that if a film has only two characters, but they do not make any sense, then the film's meaningless.
The silent film has a lot of meanings. The first part of the film is comic. It represents the burlesque feel of those silent films. But I think that the second part of the film is full of tenderness and emotion.
Going into my second film as a director, it's night and day of what it was like going into my first film. It doesn't matter what you know in your head and what you've been taught until you're there and doing it; it's a whole new ball game.
I was extremely nervous during my first film, even my second film.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!