A Quote by Ted Koppel

Terrorism is simply the weapon by which the weak engage the strong. — © Ted Koppel
Terrorism is simply the weapon by which the weak engage the strong.
... ages in which the dominant weapon is expensive or difficult to make will tend to be ages of despotism, whereas when the dominant weapon is cheap and simple, the common people have a chance... A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon -- so long as there is no answer to it -- gives claws to the weak.
I always say that non-violence is not the weapon of the weak. It is the weapon of the strong.
Terrorism is the preferred weapon of weak and evil men.
Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon - so long as there is no answer to it - gives claws to the weak.
Terrorism and deception are weapons not of the strong, but of the weak.
The weak have one weapon: the errors of those who think they are strong.
Girls, like men, want to be petted, pitied, and made much of, when they are diffident, in low spirits, or in unrequited love. These are services which the weak cannot render to the strong and which the strong will not render to the weak, except when there is also a difference of sex.
Every Christian community must realize that not only do the weak need the strong, but also that the strong cannot exist without the weak. The elimination of the weak is the death of fellowship.
Terrorists do not engage in terror attacks because they are strong. They engage in these attacks because they are weak.
But when the strong were too weak to hurt the weak, the weak had to be strong enough to leave.
Ridicule is a weak weapon when pointed at a strong mind; but common people are cowards and dread an empty laugh.
Let us build a structure of peace in the world in which the weak are as safe as the strong ? in which each respects the right of the other to live by a different system ? in which those who would influence others will do so by the strength of their ideas, and not by the force of their arms. Let us accept that high responsibility not as a burden, but gladly ? gladly because the chance to build such a peace is the noblest endeavor in which a nation can engage.
The whole macho thing has to be reexamined. Because in my view, the Bush administration was weak, not strong. To engage in a policy of torture is a weak policy. Because ultimately, it encourages the terrorists. It undermines our own values. It corrupts our system. And it doesn't get good intelligence.
We live in a wondrous time in which the strong is weak because of his moral scruples and the weak grows strong because of his audacity.
The thing that impressed me then as now about New York… was the sharp, and at the same time immense, contrast it showed between the dull and the shrewd, the strong and the weak, the rich and the poor, the wise and the ignorant… the strong, or those who ultimately dominated, were so very strong, and the weak so very, very weak - and so very, very many.
If you are strong and fighting the weak, then if you kill your opponent, then you are a scoundrel... if you let him kill you, then you are an idiot. So here is a dilemma which others have suffered before us, and for which as far as I can see, there is simply no escape.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!