A Quote by Timothy Ball
Perhaps the greatest scientific deception of the IPCC is the abuse and misuse of computer climate models. They allow them to make their reports and deliberations appear credible. They allow them to bamboozle the public because computer models are a complete mystery to most people.
Related Quotes
However useful computer models may be, the one thing they cannot be is evidence. Computer climate models are simply conjectures.
The climate-studies people who work with models always tend to overestimate their models. They come to believe models are real and forget they are only models.
We need to make sure that every child in America goes to a school every day that is safe, will teach them how to read and write, do arithmetic and gain the computer skills necessary to allow them to compete in the global marketplace. If we can get that through the public schools, fine. If we can't, I'm all for parental choice in education to allow that parent to take his/her/their child to a school that is safe and teaches them, even if it is a faith-based school!
How reliable are the computer [climate] models on which possible future climates are based? Not very. All will agree that the task of modeling climate is vast, because of the estimates that have to be made and the rubbery quality of much of the data.
Computer models of the climate....[are] a very dubious business if you don't have good inputs.
The only basis for even talking about global warming is the predictions spewed out by computer models. The only quote/unquote "evidence" of global warming is what models are predicting the climate and the weather will be in the next 50 to 100 years. Now, what those models spit out is only as good as the data that's put in, and it's an absolute joke. In terms of science, it's a total joke. There is no warming, global or otherwise!
The climate stubbornly refuses to co-operate with computer models and the writers of alarmist popular articles and books.
But if the brain is not like a computer, then what is it like? What kind of model can we form in regard to its functioning? I believe there's only one answer to that question, and perhaps it will disturb you: there is no model of the brain, nor will there ever be. That's because the brain, as the constructor of all models, transcends all models. The brain's uniqueness stems from the fact that nowhere in the known universe is there anything even remotely resembling it.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) new Summary for Policymakers is a political document that downplays assessments of uncertainty from the scientific reports. It omits much contrary evidence. In several cases, it even disagrees with the reports on which it is based.
As the popular trust in science fades - and many sociologists say that's happening today - people will develop a distrust of purely "scientific" psychology. Researchers in the universities haven't picked up on this; they're more interested in genetics and computer models of thinking than ever. But, in general, there is a huge distrust of the scientific establishment now.
In my opinion, one of the most exciting potentials of the blockchain relate to creating new business models, whether in public or in private settings. In most of these cases, the new models don't care for incumbents because they are mostly on a disruption quest.
You don't have to know people personally for them to be role models. Some of my most important role models were historical or literary figures that I only read about - never actually met.
The attribution of intelligence to machines, crowds of fragments, or other nerd deities obscures more than it illuminates. When people are told that a computer is intelligent, they become prone to changing themselves in order to make the computer appear to work better, instead of demanding that the computer be changed to become more useful.
The digital apocalypse continues to blight the lives of television producers, music-industry executives and newspaper publishers, all of whom are scrambling to figure out how to reconfigure their business models in such a way as to allow them to make an honest buck.
There are great slender models, great tall models, Amazonian models, great busty models - my point is models of all shapes and sizes, age, ethnic background should be embraced and celebrated.
I came in during the era of models, motion control, and optical printers. ILM had just started its own computer graphics division, after the Lucasfilm computer division had been sold off and became Pixar.
Related Authors
Alanis Morissette Quotes
Canadian
Musician
Douglas Coupland Quotes
Canadian
Novelist
Drake Quotes
Canadian
Musician
Jim Carrey Quotes
Canadian
Comedian
Joni Mitchell Quotes
Canadian
Musician
Justin Bieber Quotes
Canadian
Sculptor
Kelley Armstrong Quotes
Canadian
Writer
Leonard Cohen Quotes
Canadian
Novelist
Lucy Maud Montgomery Quotes
Canadian
Educator
Malcolm Gladwell Quotes
Canadian
Author
Margaret Atwood Quotes
Canadian
Novelist
Marshall McLuhan Quotes
Canadian
Sociologist
Neil Young Quotes
Canadian
Singer
Robin Sharma Quotes
Canadian
Lawyer
Steven Pinker Quotes
Canadian
Scientist
Yann Martel Quotes
Canadian
Author