A Quote by Tom Fitton

Voter confidence depends on the clean elections. — © Tom Fitton
Voter confidence depends on the clean elections.
The Indian voter today is very mature. He votes in one fashion in the Lok Sabha elections, he votes in a different manner in the State Assembly elections. We have seen this. In 2014, the General Elections conincided with the Odisha Assembly elections. The same electorate gave one judgement for Odisha and another judgement for Delhi. So this country's voter is very mature and we should trust his maturity.
We're looking at all forms of election irregularities, voter fraud, voter registration fraud, voter intimidation, suppression, and looking at the vulnerabilities of the various elections we have in each of the 50 states.
We rely on our voter registration studies to warn states that they are failing to comply with the requirements of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which requires states to make reasonable efforts to clean their voter rolls. We can and have sued to enforce compliance with federal law.
Voter fraud especially matters when elections are close.
Statistically there is enough voter fraud to sway zero elections.
We've got 50 percent voter turnout for presidential elections. That's appalling. We can do so much better.
There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud during the 2016 elections or any relatively recent election.
Requiring valid, photographic identification is a common sense step to ensure voter integrity and sound elections.
Voter fraud is a reality in American elections, but it is typical of the candidate to confuse anecdote with data and turn allegation into conspiracy.
In 1992, the most treasured voter was a voter that would sort of swing back and forth, one that might vote for Republican for president, Democrat for governor. The voter that didn't have that strong of a partisan ID. These were the voters that we targeted.
Voter identification tends to solidify after a new generation votes consecutively for the same party in three presidential elections.
'Elections have consequences,' President Obama said, setting his new policy agenda just three days after taking office in 2009. Three elections later, the president's party has lost 70 House seats and 14 Senate seats. The job of Republicans now is to govern with the confidence that elections do have consequences, promptly passing the conservative reform the voters have demanded.
You come before me this morning with clean hands and clean collars. I want you to have clean tongues, clean manners, clean morals and clean characters.
While the United States is a prime example of fair elections, there is room for improvement, starting with passing voter identification laws across the country.
Unlike the U.S., Iran has no problems with low-voter turnout in elections; the last time, the government got the support of 110 per cent of the population.
Our strength as a democracy relies on voter confidence.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!