I am a God-fearing person. Ours is a religious family and I respect all religious gurus.
I am a very proud Hindu. The foundation of my personality is laid on the teachings of Swami Vivekananda or Sanatan Dharm or the Geeta. And if my religious practices or anybody's religious practices is given any kind of sadistic name, it instills fear about other person's religious practices.
I am not a religious person, but I am spiritual. But I don't believe in things like guilt.
I am a religious person, although I am not a believer.
In the church I am very accountable, to the parish and the deanery; in the media thing I am not really accountable, I am out there on my own as a sort of busy, recognised religious person.
I was never pushed into the religion by my mother or anyone else. I made up my own mind when I was old enough. I am not a religious person, but I am spiritual.
I am an extremely religious and spiritual person.
I am a religious person and rely heavily on prayers.
I am not a religious person, nor do I have any regrets.
I'm not exactly a religious person, but I am very spiritual.
I am aware that I preach a religious doctrine understood and accepted by a very small part of the religious world, when I point out the relation of the religious concept to physical fitness.
I am a deeply spiritual and religious person both privately and publicly.
I am a person of faith who believes deeply in the right to exercise religious beliefs.
The whole point of religious faith, its strength and chief glory, is that it does not depend on rational justification. The rest of us are expected to defend our prejudices. But ask a religious person to justify their faith and you infringe 'religious liberty'.
I am a Christian, but I also dont really see myself as a religious person. I see myself as more of a spiritual person.
A lot of secular, modern people claim to be disillusioned whenever they learn that any smart person is religious. That's applicable to Newton as it is to any other religious smart person