A Quote by Vince Vaughn

Banning guns is like banning forks in an attempt to stop making people fat. — © Vince Vaughn
Banning guns is like banning forks in an attempt to stop making people fat.
You think the politicians that run my country and your country don't have guns in the schools their kids go to? They do. And we should be allowed the same rights. Banning guns is like banning forks in an attempt to stop making people fat. Taking away guns, taking away drugs, the booze, it won't rid the world of criminality.
When did banning anything, ever work? I mean, we banned liquor once in this country, oh, that worked like a charm, didn't it, folks? You couldn't find a drink in the roaring 20's, could ya? See that's the problem with the banning thing! I say why stop there, let's not ban guns, I know, let's ban crime!
Banning guns because of their misuse is like banning the First Amendment because one might libel or slander.
I'll be bossy and damn proud! Banning words, please. Try banning the system that produces polices that promote inequity.
Banning guns is an idea whose time has come.
Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe.
No, we're not looking at how to control criminals... we're talking about banning the AK-47 and semi-automatic guns.
There is no way the American public will sit still for the banning of or putting any significant restrictions on the kinds of guns they want.
I'm not suggesting at all that we take away all of the characters' vices. I am suggesting that this particular vice is so insidious, so nefarious, and so deadly that simply by glamorizing it or poisoning our young adults, and I think it's a very separate category, but in no way am I suggesting that we move on from banning smoking in movies to banning drinking, you know, or whatever else we want to do.
And nobody is talking about taking guns away from hunters or sportsmen or banning all guns. Nobody is talking about that.
There is no evidence to show that prohibition has ever had its intended impact. Of course, just as banning beef has reduced beef consumption, banning alcohol will lead to reduced alcohol consumption. But, there appears to be little or no correlation between, say, domestic violence or household impoverishment and prohibition.
The freedom-hating gun-grabbers do not care about reducing crime or saving lives, or they wouldn't be fighting for more gun-free zones where the most innocent lives are always slaughtered. Those squawking the loudest for banning guns from we the people will not get rid of their we-the-people tax-dollar-paid armed security guards.
The answer is for all of us to create our own systems, our own ideas, because vibrant independent ideas will trump this corporate, plastic Borg, this brainwashing they're trying to push. I mean, banning 'father' and 'mother,' banning the word 'husband' and 'wife,' I mean that's so cultic that if I'd of been told ten years ago they were gonna ban words like that, I wouldn't have believed it. They do it with straight faces. I mean, has the left, and of course the controlled-right as well, have they gone collectively insane on a control-freak bent? Or, is there a strategy?
Banning paper and plastic and making shoppers carry their groceries home in their mouths like dogs is just the thing to make a little tin humanist in the Obama West Wing think he's admiral of the Uzbek Navy.
The first thing to improve society is not banning abortion, but making sure that everyone who had a child is in the best position to be able to rear it.
The real election meddling is by Facebook and Google and others that are shadow-banning people.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!