A Quote by Virginia Woolf

... pure honesty is a doubtful quality; it means often lack of imagination. — © Virginia Woolf
... pure honesty is a doubtful quality; it means often lack of imagination.
Mediocrity is perhaps due not so much to lack of imagination as to lack of faith in the imagination, lack of the capacity for this abandon.
For me, insanity is super sanity. The normal is psychotic. Normal means lack of imagination, lack of creativity.
Normal means lack of imagination and creativity.
[The satirist] must fully possess, at least in the world of the imagination, the quality the lack of which he is deriding in others.
Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination.
Anyone who lives within his means suffers from a lack of imagination.
It's far too much to say that effective hoping is the only - or even the biggest - part of what it takes to succeed. If 14% of business productivity can be attributed to hope, that means 86% is dependent on raw talent, fickle business cycles, the quality of the product you're selling, and often pure, dumb luck.
Often it is just lack of imagination that keeps a man from suffering very much.
Honesty is the quality I value most in a friend. Not bluntness, but honesty with compassion.
Successful businesspeople retain a quality most others not only lack but often fail to comprehend, and that's the unrelenting drive to convert a vision into reality. They are driven to realize this goal in a manner that appears to defy logic among others who lack this drive.
Intellectual honesty is the quality that the public in free countries always has expected of historians; much more than that it does not expect, nor often get.
Don't think that the lack of leaders and of a party ideological line means anarchy, if by anarchy you mean chaos, bedlam, and pandemonium. What a tragic lack of political imagination to think that leaders and centralized structures are the only way to organize effective political projects!
When we talk about novels, we don't often talk about imagination. Why not? Does it seem too first grade? In reviews, you read about limpid prose, about the faithful reproduction of consciousness, about moral heft, but rarely about the power of pure, unadulterated imagination.
I often wonder why people remake movies. Is there just a lack of imagination out there that they can't come up with an original idea?
The truth is that literature, particularly fiction, is not the pure medium we sometimes assume it to be. Response to it is affected by things other than its own intrinsic quality; by a curiosity or lack of it about the people it deals with, their outlook, their way of life.
We are not perfectly free until we live in pure hope. For when our hope is pure, it no longer trusts exclusively in human and visible means, nor rests in any visible end. He who hopes in God trusts God, Whom he never sees, to bring him to the possession of things that are beyond imagination.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!