When I started my career, I gave four flops, and then four hits, two flops, two hits, and then three flops.
Hits and flops happen in everyone's careers. Be it an actor or a filmmaker, you can't let that affect your conviction.
More than the hits, flops will have an impact on my career. In fact, flops helped me shape my career. They made me look at things from a different angle.
Even after nine flops, an actor will get his tenth film. But, if a director gives a flop after nine hits, he will not get another film. That is the way the industry functions.
I always had a fair share of hits and flops.
I always say that you should remake flops, not hits.
Hits, flops, and everything in between - I got to do a lot of different things as an actor, had a lot of good learning experiences. So I think I've done reasonably okay for myself, and God has given me more than what I've asked for.
Hits and flops are overrated.
Hits and flops will come and go. But what stays with you is the experience you had while shooting a film. I am happy learning something new each time.
So if radio flops, and MTV flops and everything flops, it doesn't matter, as long as we're still playing and kids are coming to our shows.
If you have back-to-back flops and you're not a star's son, it depends on your destiny or contacts. People say 'No, I'm not going to take this director/actor, he's given four flops,' they forget the day when the same person was a hit.
There will always be economic pressure to make hits, identify hits, and then exploit hits. And you're going to exploit them with as many episodes as you probably can.
I've been part of the biggest hits and flops.
You learn more from the flops than from the hits.
Hits and flops are part and parcel of movie business.
Usually I am not overexcited about hits or down in the dumps for flops. I maintain a degree of equilibrium.