A Quote by Willard Van Orman Quine

Uncritical semantics is the myth of a museum in which the exhibits are meanings and the words are labels. To switch languages is to change the labels. — © Willard Van Orman Quine
Uncritical semantics is the myth of a museum in which the exhibits are meanings and the words are labels. To switch languages is to change the labels.
Everybody uses labels: they give you a handle on things - an over-simplified handle, sure, but without labels, without ads, without words, the world would be an indistinguishable mass, a blur. You can hope, maybe, that people ascribe so many labels to you that none wins out
Labels are for filing. Labels are for clothing. Labels are not for people.
I have a fear of labels. If someone labels me, I have to respond - do I acknowledge it, reject it, deny it, live up to it, and defy it? Labels can affect your ability to be yourself. If you're not careful, like I wasn't when I was young, that can take a toll on you. You find yourself conforming to everyone else's ideas of who you are.
I like the labels because I think they tell my story in a very concise way: gay, Latino. I think the responsibility that comes with accepting labels is that now I get a chance to break stereotypes. It gives me the opportunity to tell the unique stories of what those labels mean.
It's funny how we like labels. If I ever have a bookstore, I'm not going to put any labels on the sections.
The most important thing to remember about food labels is that you should avoid foods that have labels.
I hate labels, and I wear no labels. When a man has to put something around his neck and say I am, he isn't.
People don't know how to reach record labels, and a lot of time labels don't listen to stuff that's sent in randomly.
We put labels on people and fight wars over them. If we truly want harmony, we have to get past the labels.
If you look at something like Spotify, many record labels are investors in the company. So from that standpoint, the money is all going back into the labels.
Equal Vision seems to be doing really well. A lot of these major labels are just imploding and becoming indie labels, anyway.
What he labels sexual, she labels harassment.
We had labels offering us deals the first year we formed - 1995 - but we were afraid of them going, 'Let's change this and that.' We had labels telling us to get rid of our singer. I look back sometimes and go, 'Imagine if we had done that-what a shame it would have been?'
I was always looking to record, but how much I actually pursued it was another thing. The major labels weren't that interested in me, and the smaller labels didn't have any money to do anything.
Being a woman is an option, being trans is an option, and they're options that appeal to me. We need to listen to people - not labels, not semantics.
People lost the capacity of using their brain. It's all about the label. Not about the labels showing but subtlety of the labels.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!