A Quote by William Kent

All gardening is landscape painting. — © William Kent
All gardening is landscape painting.
Overall, the anarchy was the most creative of all periods of Japanese culture for in it there appeared the greatest landscape painting, the culmination of the skill of landscape gardening and the arts of flower arrangement, and the No drama.
All gardening is landscape painting,' said Alexander Pope.
When you are painting a landscape, assume the painting is real and the landscape is an illusion.
Men have dominated the field of landscape photography just as they have dominated the land itself. Thus shooting a virgin landscape has been man's work - hunting, not gardening.
You have bits of canvas that are unpainted and you have these thick stretcher bars. So you see that a painting is an object; that it's not a window into something - you're not looking at a landscape, you're not looking at a portrait, but you're looking at a painting. It's basically: A painting is a painting is a painting. And it's what Frank Stella said famously: What you see is what you see.
One ends up with a landscape one has never seen before but it is presumably the landscape you were feeling as you started the painting.
The vivacity and brightness of colors in a landscape will never bear any comparison with a landscape in nature when it is illumined by the sun, unless the painting is placed in such a position that it will receive the same light from the sun as does the landscape.
Maybe the given person, cup, or landscape is lost before one gets to painting. A figure exerts a continuing and unspecified influence on a painting as the canvas develops. The represented forms are loaded with psychological feeling. It can't ever just be painting.
I don't divide architecture, landscape and gardening; to me they are one.
(Landscapes) are too close to painting. And TV has nothing to do with painting. It's just transmission. And you can't transmit a landscape, happily enough.
Experience has proved that there is no difference between a so-called realist painting - of a landscape, for example - and an abstract painting. They both have more or less the same effect on the observer.
Painting is a science, and should be pursued as an inquiry into the laws of nature. Why, then, may not landscape painting be considered as a branch of natural philosophy, of which pictures are but the experiments?
Apart from painting and gardening, I'm not good at anything.
Computers, singing, reading, painting and gardening are my hobbies.
I spend as much time as I can in my garden, and if I'm not writing songs or gardening, I'm painting.
I am good at only two things, and those are gardening and painting.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!