A Quote by William Kristol
I don't think you want political parties that are entirely driven by some extremely doctrinal ideology.
Related Quotes
Another thing I think should be avoided is extremely intense ideology because it cabbages up one's mind. You see it a lot with T.V. preachers (many have minds made of cabbage) but it can also happen with political ideology. When you're young it's easy to drift into loyalties and when you announce that you're a loyal member and you start shouting the orthodox ideology out, what you're doing is pounding it in, pounding it in, and you're gradually ruining your mind. So you want to be very, very careful of this ideology. It's a big danger.
I think frustration unfortunately, reflects a real breakdown in the political parties themselves, which is fascinating because our constitution did not anticipate political parties. They're not even written in the Constitution, there's no guidelines. When we look at the arcane processes of delegate selection in the primaries and caucuses, it's not in the Constitution. This is all created post Constitution. And yet I think we're in the middle of tensions between and within the political parties. They're not functioning that well.
Elections in India are not contests between personalities. They are ultimately battles involving political parties; promises and pledges that political parties make; the vision and programmes that political parties bring to the table. So although, Modi's style is 'I, me, myself,' I don't think 2014 elections as a Modi versus Rahul contest.
I wouldn't say I see my work as having a political ideology. Lynn Nottage certainly has a political ideology. I think that the work is an extension of who I am, but I don't think that when I write the play I'm looking to push the audience one way or another.
A political party is about an ideology. And I don't think my goals in politics can match the ideology of any political party.
Monarchies are above political parties. Sometimes political parties do things that are to the disadvantage of the country because they want to beat the other party. In Iran, where we have different religions and ethnic groups, it was a unifying factor.
Actually, I never thought of me being president of Brazil. First of all, I'm not a politician. I never have been, and I think I'm a very unlikely person for this kind of job because of my frankness. I've never dealt with political parties. I have no connections with political parties. So, I don't think so.
I want to form a political party that's based entirely on what music people listen to. To me, it's a much better barometer of what they think and feel than their political stance.
I think the Christian Coalition could be extremely dangerous. We should always be concerned when any group wants to impose their doctrinal concerns on all. To an extent that's what they are trying to do.
I will be extremely happy if people start questioning political parties when they make electoral alliances.
Leaders of organisations, political parties and large businesses frequently fail to talk in a straight and entirely truthful fashion.
The people who started the American government, the founders of the Constitution, didn't like political parties but they were forced to start them. Nobody ever created political parties in England, they evolved. And there do tend to be two general tendencies that focus around how much government you think you need.
It's perfectly reasonable in a coalition between two political parties that you get supporters of those parties you know stressing the things they want to stress.
Cybercriminals are usually driven by profit, while cyberterrorists are driven by ideology.
First of all, there's no mention of political parties in the Constitution, so you begin American history with not only no political conventions but also no parties.
Every work of art (unless it is a psuedo-intellectualist work, a work already comprised in some ideology that it merely illustrates, as with Brecht) is outside ideology, is not reducible to ideology. Ideology circumscribes without penetrating it. The absence of ideology in a work does not mean an absence of ideas; on the contrary it fertilizes them.
Related Authors
Alan Parry Quotes
English
Commentator
Barry Davies Quotes
English
Commentator
Clive Tyldesley Quotes
English
Commentator
David Sirota Quotes
American
Commentator
Fred Barnes Quotes
American
Commentator
John Helm Quotes
English
Commentator
Jonathan Chait Quotes
American
Commentator
Joy-Ann Reid Quotes
American
Commentator
Martin Tyler Quotes
English
Commentator
Matt Millen Quotes
American
Commentator
Mort Kondracke Quotes
American
Commentator
Paul Gigot Quotes
American
Commentator
Rex Murphy Quotes
Canadian
Commentator
Sally Kohn Quotes
American
Commentator
Stephanie Miller Quotes
American
Commentator