A Quote by William Langland

Manye chapeleyns arn chaste, ac charite is aweye; Are none hardere than hii whan hii ben avaunced: Unkynde to hire kyn and to alle Cristene, Chewen hire charite and chiden after moore - Swich chastite withouten charite worth cheyned in helle.
Good people hire people better than themselves. So A players hire A+ players. But others hire below their skills to make themselves look good. So B players hire C players. C players hire D players, etc.
It's illegal to hire or fire anybody because of their race, appearance, or sexual orientation, but in Hollywood, ironically, it's the reason people will hire or not hire you.
Later, you should learn to hire fast and scale up the company, but in the early days the goal should be not to hire. Not to hire.
The most important thing is that you hire people who complement you and are better than you in specific areas. Good people hire people better than themselves. So A players hire A+ players.
I’d rather interview 50 people and not hire anyone than hire the wrong person.
I had no idea what I was gonna do after I got my degree in philosophy in 1940. But what I did know was at that time, if you were a Chinese-American, even department stores wouldn't hire you. They'd come right out and say, 'We don't hire Orientals.'
As part of the process by which you hire me, you hire me. You just don't hire an hour of me to do a performance.
Steve Jobs has a saying that A players hire A players; B players hire C players; and C players hire D players. It doesn't take long to get to Z players. This trickle-down effect causes bozo explosions in companies.
More importantly, if you are in a position to hire, hire a veteran. They will be the best employees you have.
If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.
Don't hire for the sake of hiring. Hire because there is no other way to do what you want to do.
I hire a lot of hosts, reporters, producers, and I hire people who care about the news.
The weirdest thing to me is that magazines would never do this for their writers. They would never hire a writer who writes for another magazine; they want to have their own stable of writers. Newsweek would never hire a TIME writer, and TIME would never hire a Newsweek writer - but they would both hire the same photographer to shoot a cover for them.
Of course, to publish something, you have to write it, polish it, then hire out the line editing, copy editing and cover design. After which, you pick your way through the minefield of conforming to the differing requirements of Amazon, Barnes & Noble and Smashwords, or hire someone to do it for you.
There are very few black-and-white truths in management or in business, but one that I have found is that people either hire people who are smarter than them, or people hire people they can control.
... you can think about that for everyone you hire: will I bet the future of this company on this single hire? And that's a tough bar.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!