A Quote by Wladyslaw Bartoszewski

As a historian I refuse to recognize an epochal boundary before the fact. — © Wladyslaw Bartoszewski
As a historian I refuse to recognize an epochal boundary before the fact.
Only if you reach the boundary will the boundary recede before you. And if you don't, if you confine your efforts, the boundary will shrink to accommodate itself to your efforts. And you can only expand your capacities by working to the very limit.
When trying to teach someone a boundary, they learn less from the enforcement of the boundary and more from the way the boundary was established.
I have a theory of living on the boundary: on the boundary of patriarchy and the boundary of different dimensions.
I was well into adulthood before I was prepared to acknowledge the simple fact that I am gay. It took years of struggle and growth for me to recognize that it's just a fact of life, like having brown hair, and part of who I am.
In the name of Christ, I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life. In the name of Christ, I quit Christianity and being Christian. Amen.
I'm banking on the fact that there are still good people in government who will prevent this. I've been a journalist for more than 33 years, and at Rappler we refuse to change, I refuse to be bullied.
The historian does not locate known facts in a hypothetical, general pattern of processes; his aim is to link fact to fact, one unique knowable event to another individual one that begot it.
I can see only one safe rule for the historian: that he should recognize in the development of human destinies the play of the contingent and the unforeseen.
To see, to hear, means nothing. To recognize (or not to recognize) means everything. Between what I do recognize and what I do not recognize there stands myself. And what I do not recognize I shall continue not to recognize.
In scientific work, those who refuse to go beyond fact rarely get as far as fact.
If people recognize me when I'm out in public, I'm very nice to them. I'm very nice to people even when they don't recognize me. I don't even mind if people come up to me while I'm eating dinner, but if they recognize me while I'm having sex, I refuse to sign autographs.
The boundary to what we can accept is the boundary to our freedom.
Any fact facing us, however difficult, even seemingly hopeless, is not so important as our attitude toward that fact. How you think about a fact may defeat you before you ever do anything about it. You may permit a fact to overwhelm you mentally before you deal with it actually. On the other hand, a confident and optimistic thought pattern can overcome or modify the fact altogether.
It is stupidity rather than courage to refuse to recognize danger when it is close upon you.
A positive thinker does not refuse to recognize the negative; he refuses to dwell on it.
David Irving is not just a Fascist historian. He is also a great historian of Fascism.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!