A Quote by Alexander Hamilton

The obscurity is much oftener in the passions and prejudices of the reasoner than in the subject. — © Alexander Hamilton
The obscurity is much oftener in the passions and prejudices of the reasoner than in the subject.
Men are much oftener thrown on their knees by the melancholy than by the agreeable passions.
Continue to instruct the world; and - whilst we carry on a poor unequal conflict with the passions and prejudices of our day, perhaps with no better weapons than other passions and prejudices of our own - convey wisdom to future generations.
Passions destroy more prejudices than philosophy does.
I have gone from local obscurity to national obscurity to international obscurity. Once I learn how to monetize obscurity, I will be rich.
The design of Rhetoric is to remove those Prejudices that lie in the way of Truth, to Reduce the Passions to the Government of Reasons; to place our Subject in a Right Light, and excite our Hearers to a due consideration of it.
Prejudices in disfavor of a person fix deeper, and are much more difficult to be removed, than prejudices in favor.
When indeed Religion is kindled into enthusiasm, its force like that of other passions is increased by the sympathy of a multitude. But enthusiasm is only a temporary state of Religion, and whilst it lasts will hardly be seen with pleasure at the helm. Even in its coolest state, it has been much oftener a motive to oppression than a restraint from it.
I have seen too much not to know that the impression of a woman may be more valuable than the conclusion of an analytical reasoner.
Poetry, with all its obscurity, has a more general as well as a more powerful dominion over the passions than the art of painting.
Beware how you contradict prejudices, even knowing them to be such, for the generality of people are much more tenacious of their prejudices than of anything belonging to them.
As touching the gods, I do not know whether they exist or not, nor how they are featured; for there is much to prevent our knowing: the obscurity of the subject and the brevity of human life.
I know nothing about this subject, but I do have prejudices, which I am more than happy to share with you.
Men, as well as women, are much oftener led by their hearts than by their understandings.
Temporary delusions, prejudices, excitements, and objects have irresistible influence in mere questions of policy. And the policy of one age may ill suit the wishes or the policy of another. The constitution is not subject to such fluctuations. It is to have a fixed, uniform, permanent construction. It should be, so far at least as human infirmity will allow, not dependent upon the passions or parties of particular times, but the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever.
Riches are oftener an impediment than a stimulus to action; and in many cases they are quite as much a misfortune as a blessing.
That this subject [of imaginary magnitudes] has hitherto been considered from the wrong point of view and surrounded by a mysterious obscurity, is to be attributed largely to an ill-adapted notation. If, for example, +1, -1, and the square root of -1 had been called direct, inverse and lateral units, instead of positive, negative and imaginary (or even impossible), such an obscurity would have been out of the question.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!