A Quote by Bradley A. Smith

There is no evidence that super PACs have led to a greater percentage of negative ads. — © Bradley A. Smith
There is no evidence that super PACs have led to a greater percentage of negative ads.
By law, super PACs are required to disclose their donors. There are groups that have never had to disclose their donors, non-profits such as the Sierra Club, Planned Parenthood, the NAACP, and the NRA. If you want more disclosure, super PACs are a step forward.
Few developments in campaigning have been as vilified and misunderstood as independent expenditure PACs, or, as they are colloquially known, super PACs.
These candidates are all beholden to these super PACs.
I've done a number of Super Bowl ads. And that is the best advertising of the year. That is when people realize they're going to be compared directly against other ads.
I'm not backed by the super PACs and the big corporations.
I would do away with super PACs. I think it's a cancer.
I mean this is a revolution in how campaigns work - more money was spent by super PACs than by either myself or John Faso. So what that means is that if you're a voter in this district you are more likely to have heard from a super PAC than from me or my opponent.
It's time for grassroots citizens to have a president that's focused on them rather than the super PACs.
Politics has certainly changed a lot in an era of micro-targeting, Super PACs, and Twitter.
Most super PACs are a money-laundering operation that exists solely to enrich the members or its founders.
The super-salesman neither permits his subconscious mind to "broadcast" negative thoughts nor give expression to them through words, for the reason that he understands that "like attracts like" and negative suggestions attract negative action and negative decisions from prospective buyers.
It is true that raids and battles killed a tiny percentage of the numbers that die in modern warfare. But in tribal violence, the clashes are more frequent, the percentage of men in the population who fight is greater, and the rates of death per battle are higher.
The evidence that you truly repented long ago when you said you did is because you're still repenting now and even to a greater degree. The evidence that you believed a long time ago is that you're still believing now and ever more believing in greater and greater degrees.
A lot of our Democratic consultants have fallen into the self-defeating prescription that the candidate that runs the most negative ads wins. I have a new theory: Positive is the new negative.
I think there's a lot of reasons for having an extended primary. I think super PACs play a role.
The super PACs have brought an element of fear into the equation. The fact that they can bring this money into the campaign, basically ambush you out of nowhere, and you'll have no way to fight back.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!