A Quote by Bruce Sterling

I don't think there's much distinction between surveillance and media in general. Better media means better surveillance. Cams are everywhere. — © Bruce Sterling
I don't think there's much distinction between surveillance and media in general. Better media means better surveillance. Cams are everywhere.
Closed Circuit' came out of a general anxiety about surveillance. Government surveillance and private surveillance.
Orwell wasn't right about where society was in 1984. We haven't turned into that sort of surveillance society. But that may be, at least in small part, because of his book. The notion that ubiquitous surveillance and state manipulation of the media is evil is deeply engrained in us.
The issue I brought forward most clearly was that of mass surveillance, not of surveillance in general.
I've never seen more dishonest media than frankly, the political media. I thought the financial media was much better, much more honest.
I think mass surveillance is a bad idea because a surveillance society is one in which people understand that they are constantly monitored.
The concept of surveillance is ingrained in our beings. God was the original surveillance camera.
While President Obama may not have ordered any surveillance of Trump or his advisors, the real question is whether he or Attorney General Loretta Lynch were aware of or approved of any surveillance of Trump and his staff during the campaign.
Martin Luther King was a victim of surveillance, and had great solidarity with victims of surveillance.
The media could do a much better job, that's for sure, especially the media that targets women... Human rights? They couldn't care less!
I'd like to have a little better relationship with the media. It's just that I don't think the media is comfortable with me.
I've always moved between media. Some ideas just work better in some media than others.
Is there some reason why the quality of people going into the parliament is not as high? I don't know the complete answer, but I think - in fact, I'm sure - that part of it is the increasing intrusiveness of the media - the general media and social media - into the private lives of politicians and their families.
What is the society we wish to protect? Is it the society of complete surveillance for the commonwealth? Is this the wealth we seek to have in common - optimal security at the cost of maximal surveillance?
For better or worse, the United States enjoys the lion's share of public and media attention. We influence much of the conversation on social and public media by sheer volume.
We have to call mass surveillance mass surveillance. We can't let governments around the world redefine, and sort of weasel their way out of it by saying this is bulk collection.
The arrival of television established a mass-media order that dominated the last 50 years. This is a personal media revolution. The distinction between the old order and the new order is very important. Television delivered the world to our living room. In the old media, all we could do was press our noses against the glass and watch.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!