A Quote by James K. Polk

One great object of the Constitution was to restrain majorities from oppressing minorities or encroaching upon their just rights. — © James K. Polk
One great object of the Constitution was to restrain majorities from oppressing minorities or encroaching upon their just rights.
To say that majorities, as such, have a right to rule minorities, is equivalent to saying that minorities have, and ought to have, no rights, except such as majorities please to allow them.
The object of a Constitution is to restrain the Government, as that of laws is to restrain individuals.
Majorities can be wrong, majorities can overrule rights of minorities. If majorities ruled, we could still have slavery. 80% of the population once enslaved 20% of the population. While run by majority rule that is ok. That is very flawed notion of what democracy is. Democracy has to take into account several things - proportionate requirements of people, not just needs of the majority, but also needs of the minority. Majority, especially in societies where the media manipulates public opinion, can be totally wrong and evil. People have to act according to conscience and not by majority vote.
Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities (and the smallest minority on earth is the individual).
Judges are the people who have to protect the rights of individuals, have to protect the rights of minorities, have to protect the rights in the Constitution, have to protect the requirement that the executive and the legislature not simply exercise raw power but adhere to standards of reasonableness and constitutionality.
[The] government has room to scale back individual rights during wartime without violating the Constitution. The Constitution just sets minimums. Most of the rights that you enjoy go way beyond what the Constitution requires.
Of strong importance to me is the defense of minority rights, not just racial minorities, but ideological and religious minorities.
The Court has long held that the Constitution protects certain fundamental rights that are not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution's text, while at the same time emphasizing that courts must proceed with great caution in recognizing such rights.
Majorities, of course, start with minorities.
The minorities are sometimes right. The majorities never.
We know no document is perfect, but when we amend the Constitution, it would be to expand rights, not to take away rights from decent, loyal Americans. This great Constitution of ours should never be used to make a group of Americans permanent second-class citizens.
The Constitution was not written to restrain the citizen's behavior, it was writtne to restrain the government's behavior.
It is the West that has liberated women, racial minorities, religious minorities, and gays and lesbians, recognizing and defending their rights. The notions of freedom and human rights were present at the dawn of Western civilization, as ideals at least, but have gradually come to fruition through supreme acts of self-criticism.
Majorities and minorities cannot rightfully be taken at all into account in deciding questions of justice.
We are not in a situation where the minorities are demanding something and the majorities are pushing back saying 'We don't want it.'
Acting alone, minorities can never achieve the majorities necessary for political change.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!