A Quote by David Novak

During the Middle Ages, Jews were members of a semi-independent polity within a larger polity. — © David Novak
During the Middle Ages, Jews were members of a semi-independent polity within a larger polity.
Those who directed the state in the time of Solon and Cleisthenes did not establish a polity which ... trained the citizens in such fashion that they looked upon insolence as democracy, lawlessness as liberty, impudence of speech as equality, and licence to do what they pleased as happiness, but rather a polity which detested and punished such men and by so doing made all the citizens better and wiser.
The right constitutions, three in number- kingship, aristocracy, and polity- and the deviations from these, likewise three in number - tyranny from kingship, oligarchy from aristocracy, democracy from polity.
I hazard the guess that man will be ultimately known for a mere polity of multifarious, incongruous, and independent denizens.
Politics is rather the creation of the best possible polity out of the deep inner needs of its citizenry - who are only some of its members.
For those who have envisioned the State of Israel to be a democracy, which although primarily a Jewish polity for Jews is one in which non-Jews can become citizens and enjoy equal civil rights with the Jewish majority, the question of natural law is the question of human rights.
Republics demanded virtue. Monarchies could rely on coercion and "dazzling splendor" to suppress self-interest or factions; republics relied on the goodness of the people to put aside private interest for public good. The imperatives of virtue attached all sorts of desiderata to the republican citizen: simplicity, frugality, sobriety, simple manners, Christian benevolence, duty to the polity. Republics called on other virtues--spiritedness, courage--to protect the polity from external threats. Tyrants kept standing armies; republics relied on free yeomen, defending their own land.
Can any one be so indifferent or idle as not to care to know by what means, and under what kind of polity, almost the whole inhabited world was conquered and brought under the dominion of the single city of Rome, and that too within a period of not quite fifty-three years?
Indian polity has failed to provide solutions to the common man's problems.
All the forms of civil polity have been tried by mankind, except one, and that seems to have been reserved in Providence to be realized in America. Most of the states, of all ages ...have been founded in rapacity, usurpation, and injustice; so that in the contests recorded in history ...the military history of all nations being but a description of the wars and invasions of the mutual robbers and devastators of the human race.
Unity and secularism will be the motto of the government. We can't afford divisive polity in India.
But Connecticut and Rhode Island have originally realized the most perfect polity as to a legislature.
In politics, Joseph Smith was something of a radical. He preached, instead of democracy, a version of theocratic rule within a framework given by his own prophetic leadership. At Nauvoo, Smith affected a Napoleonic uniform and made himself into a general and quasi king of the polity he had constituted.
Right to Information is a small concrete step in making our polity more democratic.
Laws and systems of polity always begin by recognizing the relations they find already existing between individuals.
In a polity, each citizen is to possess his own arms, which are not supplied or owned by the state.
It holds for good polity ever, to have that outwardly in vilest estimation, which inwardly is most dear to us.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!