A Quote by Paul Halmos

The author discusses valueless measures in pointless spaces. — © Paul Halmos
The author discusses valueless measures in pointless spaces.
I remember one occasion when I tried to add a little seasoning to a review, but I wasn't allowed to. The paper was by Dorothy Maharam, and it was a perfectly sound contribution to abstract measure theory. The domains of the underlying measures were not sets but elements of more general Boolean algebras, and their range consisted not of positive numbers but of certain abstract equivalence classes. My proposed first sentence was: "The author discusses valueless measures in pointless spaces."
You imagine a reader and try to keep the reader interested. That's storytelling. You also hope to reward the reader with a sense of a completed design, that somebody is in charge, and that while life is pointless, the book isn't pointless. The author knows where he is going. That's form.
Everything useful in mathematics has been devised for a purpose. Even if you don't know it, the guy who did it first, he knew what he was doing. Banach didn't just develop Banach spaces for the sake of it. He wanted to put many spaces under one heading. Without knowing the examples, the whole thing is pointless.
One never discusses anything with anybody who can understand one discusses things with people who cannot understand.
Don't pointless things have a place, too, in this far-from-perfect world? Remove everything pointless from an imperfect life, and it'd lose even its imperfection.
In New York there's a lot of interstitial spaces; spaces in between spaces, where you're changing, and New York gives you the anonymity to be who you want to be.
Web publishing can create common spaces; it all depends on how we, the readers and sometimes the producers, react to technological change. If we sort ourselves into narrow groups, common spaces will be in big trouble. But there's no reason not to have common spaces on the Internet. There are lots of them out there.
Art is so wonderfully irrational, exuberantly pointless, but necessary all the same. Pointless and yet necessary, that's hard for a puritan to understand.
It's the pointless things that give your life meaning. Friendship, compassion, art, love. All of them pointless. But they're what keeps life from being meaningless.
Oftentimes, secrecy involves creating spaces that are outside of the law but are outside the normal channels of oversight. And I think it's pretty easy to see that if you create spaces that are essentially outside the law, then you're creating spaces where anything can happen.
the giver measures his gift with one yardstick, and the receiver measures it with another.
I believe Ofsted measures poverty. It measures deprivation. It doesn't measure excellence.
On all vital measures, measures necessary to protect you, the Democrats in Washington follow a simple philosophy: Just say no.
I have never admitted the right of an elderly author to alter the work of a young author, even when the young author happens to be his former self.
Many of the early nationalisation measures were right. They have remained part of the social fabric. I favour measures of that type.
Flipping our classrooms into active learning spaces really is important and having these convenient spaces where people feel comfortable.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!