A Quote by Renee Montagne

I think if you're in favor of World War III, you have your candidate. You know, here's the thing. — © Renee Montagne
I think if you're in favor of World War III, you have your candidate. You know, here's the thing.
You can't prevent World War III. You don't have any juice. In fact, World War III will free you. ... Your time has come.
One began to hear it said that World War I was the chemists' war, World War II was the physicists' war, World War III (may it never come) will be the mathematicians' war.
There's not going to be a World War III, because there is no one to have World War III with.
A country cannot simultaneously prepare and prevent war. I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. The distinctions separating the social classes are false; in the last analysis they rest on force.
"Red Dawn" was a movie made in 1984 I think about World War III. If you have not seen it and plan on watching it, you want to close your eye and cover your ears but not really. You can figure it out.
Gosh, I think faith is a wonderful thing. And I even think religion's a wonderful thing. I know a lot of people want to say, 'Religion's the only reason that man has had any trouble at all,' but you know what? World War I and World War II were not fought because of religious reasons.
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
We've suffered a war, and one thing we know: Whenever our nation's faced war, whether it was in the 1980s when we were winning the Cold War or in the 1940s during World War II, the responsible thing to do has been to borrow money to win the war.
You will vote for first choice candidate whether or not you think he'll win. But I'm saying you may find yourself for a candidate, a middling candidate, a candidate you don't think very well of, really. And you really don't like to avoid a catastrophe. Well, maybe that's a good thing. You can argue that back and forth.
You have to decide in advance whether you're ready go to war. If you guys are ready to send a million troops into Ukraine and fight World War III, you're going to do it without my support because I think that's a really foolish notion.
The two sides that fought in World War I lived in the same century but in different places. The same is true for World War II. In World War III, both sides are almost everywhere, but they live in different centuries.
World War III is a guerrilla information war with no division between military and civilian participation.
"World War III, was the Cold War".
"World War III, was the Cold War, and the U.S. won it".
It's hard to be a son of a candidate. It's hard to be a brother of a candidate. I think it may be the hardest thing to be the dad of the candidate.
World War III would become a great possibility, but such a scenario is quite possible under any new US administration... To answer your question: business as usual.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!