A Quote by Frederik, Crown Prince of Denmark

Historically, royal families have represented an institution. The institution is built on heritage, and is timeless in that sense. — © Frederik, Crown Prince of Denmark
Historically, royal families have represented an institution. The institution is built on heritage, and is timeless in that sense.
I'm not sure that it's right to view this as excluding a particular group. When the institution of marriage developed historically, people didn't get around and say, 'Let's have this institution, but let's keep out homosexuals.' The institution developed to serve purposes that, by their nature, didn't include homosexual couples.
If the Royal Variety Show was put in a matter transportation machine with the Royal Institution Christmas lectures, this is what you'd get.
Because marriage is a sacred institution and the foundation of society, it should not be redefined by activist judges. For the good of families, children and society, I support a constitutional amendment to protect the institution of marriage.
Your ancestors fought for you to have a share in that institution over there. It's yours. See the school board, and every Friday night hold your meetings there. Have your wives clean it up Saturday morning for the children to enter Monday. Your organization is not a praying institution. It's a fighting institution. It's an educational institution along industrial lines. Pray for the dead and fight like hell for the living!
I was looking for a new challenge and got an interest in trying to make a difference for families. You become more aware of how important families are. They are the key institution in our culture. The reason I got into politics was to try to make a difference for that key institution, whether it was tax policy, education policy, or whatever.
O truly enjoy... [a university], the individual-student or faculty-must harbor a well-calibrated sense of annoyance at the institution, entering into a muted adversarial relationship...both in order to move the institution just that little bit away from what is was to what it could become, and also to assure at least the sense if not the reality of independence.
Marriage is built around complementarity of the sexes and therefore the institution of marriage is a support for stable families and societies.
Marriage is built around complementarity of the sexes, and therefore the institution of marriage is a support for stable families and societies.
It is therefore our business to restore economic freedom through the restoration of the only institution under which it flourishes, which institution is Property. The problem before us is, how to restore Property so that it shall be, as it was not so long ago, a general institution.
Management that wants to change an institution must first show that it loves that institution.
If we do not restore the Institution of Property we cannot escape restoring the Institution of Slavery; there is no third course.
Marriage is a wonderful institution, but who would want to live in an institution?
Courts are an aristocratic institution in a democracy. That's the dilemma for an institution that has the function of reviewing the will of the people. We're bound to be "anti-majoritarian."
A founder can carry an institution only so far, and then others have to step in, even the alumni. That's how an institution becomes one.
The Royal Academy of Dance is an institution that trains to a very high standard.
Marriage is a wonderful institution, but who wants to live in an institution?
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!