A Quote by Chip Kidd

If you can properly define the problem, then you've already defined the solution as well. — © Chip Kidd
If you can properly define the problem, then you've already defined the solution as well.
The solution to a problem - a story that you are unable to finish - is the problem. It isn't as if the problem is one thing and the solution something else. The problem, properly understood = the solution. Instead of trying to hide or efface what limits the story, capitalize on that very limitation. State it, rail against it.
If I get a well-defined role and properly etched scenes, then I feel motivated to perform better.
If you define the problem correctly, you almost have the solution.
A favorite means of escaping the solution to any problem is to declare it too complex for solution. This absolves us from attempting solution. ... Any problem is too complex to solve when we do not wish to accept the conditions of solution. Solution is possible where acceptance is ready.
If you don't define the problem you'll never reach a painful solution.
I see the war problem as an economic problem, a business problem, a cultural problem, an educational problem - everything but a military problem. There's no military solution. There is a business solution - and the sooner we can provide jobs, not with our money, but the United States has to provide the framework.
Design is a response to a specific problem. You are given a problem to solve, and then you let the problem itself tell you what your solution is.
Often how you define the problem will determine whether or not you're able to find a real solution.
My dad died when I was young. He was a good and decent man. There are a few things he would say that have just always stuck with me. He'd say, "Son, you're either part of the problem or part of the solution." Well, regrettably, President Obama has become part of the problem, and Mitt Romney is the solution.
Great thinkers think inductively, that is, they create solution and then seek out the problems that solution might solve; most companies think deductively, that is, defining a problem and then investigating different solutions.
Just like Pharaoh couldn't get a solution to his problem until he talked to Moses, or Nebuchadnezzar or Belshazzar couldn't get a solution to his problem until he talked to Daniel, the white man in America today will never understand the race problem or come anywhere near getting a solution to the race problem until he talks to The Honorable Elijah Muhammad.
Each pattern describes a problem which occurs over and over again in our environment, and then describes the core of the solution to that problem, in such a way that you can use this solution a million times over, without ever doing it in the same way twice.
We would want the solution to the safety problem before somebody figures out the solution to the AI problem.
If you define evolution as merely meaning change over time, then I don't see any problem with a person being a Christian and believing in evolution. But that's not how textbooks define evolution. They define evolution as being random and undirected without plan or purpose.
If you're going to define me properly, you must think in terms of my failures as well as my successes.
There's a solution to every problem. I just have to find the right solution to fix this problem
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!