A Quote by Andrew Ng

If you want to publish data, you should do it to share knowledge. — © Andrew Ng
If you want to publish data, you should do it to share knowledge.
Data isn't information. ... Information, unlike data, is useful. While there's a gulf between data and information, there's a wide ocean between information and knowledge. What turns the gears in our brains isn't information, but ideas, inventions, and inspiration. Knowledge-not information-implies understanding. And beyond knowledge lies what we should be seeking: wisdom.
You can't publish a paper on physics without the full experimental data and results; that should be the standard in journalism.
Send it to someone who can publish it. And if they won't publish it, send it to someone else who can publish it! And keep sending it! Of course, if no one will publish it, at that point you might want to think about doing something other than writing.
You can see it on the Internet now. New society demands that people share their knowledge. It's asking multimillionaires to share their money and creative people to share their creativity. Whoever doesn't share their wealth, be it knowledge, money, or creativity, will be dead.
I feel that all knowledge should be in the free-trade zone. Your knowledge, my knowledge, everybody's knowledge should be made use of. I think people who refuse to use other people's knowledge are making a big mistake. Those who refuse to share their knowledge with other people are making a great mistake, because we need it all. I don't have any problem about ideas I got from other people. If I find them useful, I'll just ease them right in and make them my own.
I think there's data, and then there's information that comes from data, and then there's knowledge that comes from information. And then, after knowledge, there is wisdom. I am interested in how to get from data to wisdom.
So now I have a collection of poetry by Aaron Neville and I give it to people I want to share it with. I'd like to publish it someday.
But it's clear to me that us slow-poke writers are a dying breed. It's amazing how thoroughly my young writing students have internalized the new machine rhythm, the rush many of my young writers are in to publish. The majority don't want to sit on a book for four, five years. The majority don't want to listen to the silence inside and outside for their artistic imprimatur. The majority want to publish fast, publish now.
When we share our personal data with business, its use should be transparent and secure.
It took a while for anyone to want to publish 'To Repel Ghosts.' I thought people would want to publish a three-hundred-and-fifty-page book about a dead painter, but they didn't.
Despite the value of open data, most labs make no systematic effort to share data with other scientists.
I don't believe in data-driven anything, it's the most stupid phrase. Data should always serve people, people should never serve data.
We can say, "if you want government money, you have to make this data public - you have to share it."
Knowledge about limitations of your data collection process affects what inferences you can draw from the data.
In matters of truth the fact that you don't want to publish something is, nine times out of ten, a proof that you ought to publish it.
People should have to opt in for any kind of data sharing, and they should know what the data is being used for.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. More info...
Got it!