Television is a performance, but apps actually reflect thought processes.
I have a lot of game apps I need to delete.
If you buy the Chromebook Plus and intend to use it mainly as a Chromebook, I expect you'll have a good experience. But if you plan to rely heavily on Android apps, you're basically buying into the start of a journey, replete with odd-looking presentations of familiar apps, bugs and crashes.
Apps have made it easier to meet people but harder to connect.
Knowledge comes from our senses, extend our senses and we extend our knowledge. Let's stop building apps for mobile phones and start building apps for our bodies.
There are hundreds of millions of people on dating apps every day, but apparently, no such apps cater solely to sports fans.
I don't consider ideas for apps all that valuable. It's the implementation of an idea that matters.
On Apple's special store for the Chinese market, apps related to the Dalai Lama are censored, as is one containing information about the exiled Uighur dissident leader Rebiya Kadeer. Apple similarly censors apps for iPads sold in China.
The most successful apps have taken a societal problem and built an accessible and democratic solution.
But I've become completely obsessed with taking photos on my iPhone. I have like 400 apps.
I am prescribing a lot more apps than medications these days.
Blackberry is a great product and really useful. But I think that Yahoo!'s future is going to be rooted in mobile apps. And we know that we need to have apps on some of the core platforms, and so iOS and Android, probably the two most important platforms for us.
If you look at things that are popular apps, it doesn't mean it's going to stick around.
We struggle with this every single day - will third-party apps have room in the future of ecosystems?
I'm rarely invited to start-up parties, but who cares about their trinkets and apps anyway?
Though the S8, like all premium Samsung phones, runs Android with the basic Google suite of apps, Samsung keeps trying to duplicate Android functions with its own software. It wants to be a software platform like its rival Apple, but it uses someone else's operating system and core apps. Awkward.
I'm deleting all my editing apps I used to slim myself down and airbrush pics.
When you experience great voice apps, it makes tapping on an app so circa 2005.
Good companies do whatever it takes to make sure apps are great and don't hesitate to add features.
Using the correct apps can completely change how your photos look. It's really exciting because once you've already taken a good photo, it can become 10 times better if you use the right combination of apps. My favorites are VSCO Cam, Afterlight, Facetune and SKRWT.
I'm at the stage in my life that real-estate apps turn me on.
There's a shift to mobile apps; I'd like to see a more pervasive communications experience, and I think Skype can contribute to that.
One of the things that's making ArcGIS come alive is apps. Apps are opening up the ArcGIS platform, making it available to everybody in your organization as well as to the public.
Just invest in apps. Just download apps and then pay yourself the dividend.
The only people who don’t love apps are pundits who don’t understand that apps aren’t really in opposition to the open Internet. They’re just superior clients to open Internet services.
I deleted all the apps. You can actually turn off the App Store. And I gave the passcode to my wife so I didn't have the passcode to reinstall the App Store. And I deleted all social media apps and e-commerce apps.
I think I have over 60 apps on my iPhone. I use six.
In the area of field apps, Collector for ArcGIS is great, but where do you go? There's a navigator app. And then what do you do when you get there? There's a workforce app. So all of these apps work hand-in-hand to support field workers.
When you and I go to work, and we use a computer to work and find that our work apps are completely onerous and the apps we use at home are quite easy, we wonder, why can't it be simpler, easier, quicker, and less expensive?
I think Comedy Central and probably all channels are on their way toward being apps accessible on whatever the Roku of the future is.
There may be 300,000 apps for the iPhone and iPad, but the only app you really need is the browser. You don't need an app for the web ... You don't need to go through some kind of SDK ... You can use your web tools ... And you can publish your apps to the BlackBerry without writing any native code.
The user, not the ISP, should be the kingmaker of apps.
Right now, nearly all the apps on Facebook take a week to build. No more.
I live on my phone: I have a bunch of news and informational apps on there.
I think dating apps are keeping us apart.
WhatsApp deliberately obfuscates their apps' binaries to make sure no one is able to study them thoroughly.
Apps, email, and social are the three things Google does not control.
Apps have become a preferred way of accessing information on mobile devices.
I use a lot of the Web 2.0 apps that I've seen out there, and I think there is incredible work going on there.
The iPad's all about proprietary apps that are supposed to be amazing on the bigger screen.
To put it simply, it doesn't matter how many other messaging apps are out there if all of them suck.
The younger generation is surrounded by the Internet, apps, and video games. But somehow, my books make them read.
If you've got five or six cloud apps, do you want a different user ID and password for each one? No.
Many people have uninstalled Chinese apps. So when crores uninstall apps. It will be a message for the Chinese government when they are intruding into India.
When it comes to the mobile web, the technology industry seems to be split between two camps - native apps and HTML5 web-based apps.
I've been a stargazer for quite a long time, I've got the apps, I know where a lot of things are in the sky and the apps actually can help just to point out what you are looking at because then you do get to see, 'Oh that's Saturn, that's Mars.'
I'm not enthusiastic about educational games or apps generally.
I don't like it when people remain glued to their phones while talking, so I have no apps on mine.
Mostly I use the O2 as an X terminal, however, running my apps on Linux and displaying remotely.
CIOs have to be able to lay out a clear path in concert with the business leader - I used to make the business guy responsible for the apps and force them to answer the question of why they feel they need non-standard apps when they know that's how the costs skyrocket.
For systems in which you already have a lot of hardware and software, change is difficult. That's why apps are so popular.
On mobile, what are the core apps? It's basically messaging, mapping and review data.
I'm on all the apps: Tinder, Grindr, Bumble, Scruff. I have no shame about that.
I like to download as many apps as I can - especially the ones with games and gadgets.
I'm not really on dating apps. I used to be when I was younger. I'd rather meet people in real life.
There are a lot of apps that are fun to use - they're utility apps; they're fine. But there are a fraction of apps that are in the cream of the crop. You just need to be in the cream of the crop to get noticed.
A person who is app-dependent is always searching for the best app; and as soon as its routine has been executed, the person searches for the next app. A person who is app-enabled also uses apps frequently. But he or she is never limited by the current array of apps; apps will free the person to do what he or she wants to do, or needs to do, irrespective of the next application of the app. An app-enabled person can also put devices away, without feeling bereft.
Have confidence in your strengths, dear writer, or give it all up now and create apps instead.
I don't really have any apps!
I used to edit my pictures and make my lips look even bigger in the editing apps.
This site uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience.
More info...